Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36194600›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Raising the bar for patient experience during care transitions in Canada: A repeated cross-sectional survey evaluating a patient-oriented discharge summary at Ontario hospitals.

Karen Okrainec, Audrey Chaput, Valeria E Rac, George Tomlinson, John Matelski, Mark Robson, Amy Troup, Murray Krahn, Shoshana Hahn-Goldberg

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06679309 (Paving a Road Map for Integrated Care Evaluation in Canada), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06679309 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Paving a Road Map for Integrated Care Evaluation in Canada: A Mixed Methods Evaluation for Patients With Complex Care Needs in Ontario and Alberta

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of CalgaryRan2025 to 2028Enrolled2,000ConditionsHealth Care Quality, Access, and EvaluationArmsIntegrated care plan
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Karen OkrainecToronto General Hospital Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-0754-1830
Audrey ChaputOpenLab, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Valeria E RacInstitute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
George TomlinsonInstitute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
John MatelskiBiostatistics Research Unit, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Mark RobsonOntario Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Amy TroupToronto General Hospital Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Murray KrahnToronto General Hospital Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Shoshana Hahn-GoldbergOpenLab, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

CIHR TEG 165591
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatient experience when transitioning home from hospital is an important quality metric linked to improved patient outcomes. We evaluated the impact of a hospital-based care transition intervention, patient-oriented discharge summary (PODS), on patient experience across Ontario acute care hospitals.

methodsWe used a repeated cross-sectional study design to compare yearly positive (top-box) responses to four questions centered on discharge communication from the Canadian Patient Experience Survey (2016-2020) among three hospital cohorts with various levels of PODS implementation. Generalized Estimating Equations using a binomial likelihood accounting for site level clustering was used to assess continuous linear time trends among cohorts and cohort differences during the post-implementation period. This research had oversight from a public advisory group of patient and caregiver partners from across the province.

results512,288 individual responses were included. Compared to non-implementation hospitals, hospitals with full implementation (>50% discharges) reported higher odds for having discussed the help needed when leaving hospital (OR = 1.18, 95% CI = 1.02-1.37) and having received information in writing about what symptoms to look out for (OR = 1.44, 95% = 1.17-1.78) post-implementation. The linear time trend was also significant when comparing hospitals with full versus no implementation for having received information in writing about what symptoms to look out for (OR = 1.05, 95% CI = 1.01-1.09).

interpretationPODS implementation was associated with higher odds of positive patient experience, particularly for questions focused on discharge planning. Further efforts should center on discharge management, specifically: understanding of medications and what to do if worried once home.

Indexed as

Patient DischargePatient TransferCross-Sectional StudiesHospitalsHumansOntarioPatient Outcome Assessment

Identifiers

PMID36194600
PMCPMC9531793

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.