Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36194466›Full record

ArticleJMIR nursing2022

Digital Technologies and the Role of Health Care Professionals: Scoping Review Exploring Nurses' Skills in the Digital Era and in the Light of the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Valentina Isidori, Francesco Diamanti, Lorenzo Gios, Giulia Malfatti, Francesca Perini, Andrea Nicolini, Jessica Longhini, Stefano Forti, Federica Fraschini, Giancarlo Bizzarri and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR nursing, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
18.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 99 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Valentina IsidoriDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, University of Perugia, Terni, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4460-9662
Francesco DiamantiDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, University of Perugia, Terni, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7130-9430
Lorenzo GiosTrentinoSalute4.0, Centro di Competenza per la Sanità Digitale, Trento, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2981-0851
Giulia MalfattiTrentinoSalute4.0, Centro di Competenza per la Sanità Digitale, Trento, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9655-5064
Francesca PeriniTrentinoSalute4.0, Centro di Competenza per la Sanità Digitale, Trento, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6558-5060
Andrea NicoliniTrentinoSalute4.0, Centro di Competenza per la Sanità Digitale, Trento, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9189-3697
Jessica LonghiniAzienda Provinciale per i Servizi Sanitari, Trento, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4198-075X
Stefano FortiTrentinoSalute4.0, Centro di Competenza per la Sanità Digitale, Trento, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3471-2033
Federica FraschiniAzienda Unità Sanitaria Locale Umbria 2, Terni, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3551-8622
Giancarlo BizzarriAmministratore Unico di PuntoZero, Perugia, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3644-3615
Stefano BrancorsiniDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, University of Perugia, Terni, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8410-7248
Alessandro GaudinoDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, University of Perugia, Terni, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8619-8350
Provincia Autonoma di Trento · ITUniversity of Perugia · ITASL Roma · ITUniversity for Foreigners Perugia · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe nursing role significantly changed following reforms in the nurse training process. Nowadays, nurses are increasingly trained to promote and improve the quality of clinical practice and to provide support in the assistance of patients and communities. Opportunities and threats are emerging as a consequence of the introduction of new disruptive technologies in public health, which requires the health care staff to develop new digital skills.

objectiveThe aim of this paper is to review and define the role of nurses and the skills they are asked to master in terms of new methodological approaches and digital knowledge in a continuously evolving health care scenario that relies increasingly more on technology and digital solutions.

methodsThis scoping review was conducted using a thematic summary of previous studies. Authors collected publications through a cross-database search (PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar) related to new telemedicine approaches impacting the nurses' role, considering the time span of 2011-2021 and therefore including experiences and publications related to the first phase of the COVID-19 pandemic.

resultsThe assessment was completed between April and July 2021. After a cross-database search, authors reviewed a selection of 60 studies. The results obtained were organized into 5 emerging macro areas: (1) leadership (nurses are expected to show leadership capabilities when introducing new technologies in health care practices, considering their pivotal role in coordinating various professional figures and the patient), (2) soft skills (new communication skills, adaptiveness, and problem solving are needed to adapt the interaction to the level of digital skills and digital knowledge of the patient), (3) training (specific subjects need to be added to nursing training to boost the adoption of new communication and technological skills, enabling health care professionals to largely and effectively use new digital tools), (4) remote management of COVID-19 or chronic patients during the pandemic (a role that has proved to be fundamental is the community and family nurse and health care systems are adopting novel assistance models to support patients at home and to enable decentralization of services from hospitals to the territory), and (5) management of interpersonal relationships with patients through telemedicine (a person-centered approach with an open and sensitive attitude seems to be even more important in the framework of telemedicine where a face-to-face session is not possible and therefore nonverbal indicators are more problematic to be noticed).

conclusionsFurther advancing nurses' readiness in adopting telemedicine requires an integrated approach, including combination of technical knowledge, management abilities, soft skills, and communication skills. This scoping review provides a wide-ranging and general-albeit valuable-starting point to identify these core competences and better understand their implications in terms of present and future health care professionals' roles.

Indexed as

communication and technological skillsCOVID-19digital healthdigital knowledgehealth careleadershipnew technological approachesnursingnursing trainingonline healthrole of the nurse in telemedicinetelehealthtelemedicinetelenursing

Identifiers

PMID36194466
PMCPMC9579937
OpenAlexW4225379991

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.