ReviewInsights into imaging2022
Magnetic resonance imaging patterns of paediatric brain infections: a pictorial review based on the Western Australian experience.
Review in Insights into imaging, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Postviral encephalitis in a child with bilateral basal ganglia involvement: MRI findings and diagnostic considerations.Radiology case reports · 2026Article
- Article
- Neuroimaging in inborn errors of immunity: More than infections.Neuroradiology · 2026Review
- Cryptococcosis in Pediatric Renal Transplant Recipients: Comparative Insights from Adult Cases.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Review
- The burden of infective encephalitis in children in Asian countries (1990-2021): systematic analysis and projection of the burden of disease.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025Article
- Challenging neonatal central nervous system fungal infection diagnosed by MRI: a case report.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2025Article
- Evaluation of children with acute central nervous system infections admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit and pediatric ward: a retrospective study.BMC pediatrics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Paediatric brain infections are relatively uncommon, but it is important for radiologists to recognise the disease and provide accurate differential diagnoses. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) plays an important role in determining the most likely causative pathogen-either in the setting of an unwell child with acute infectious encephalitis, or in the evaluation of a child for sequela of prior infection. Image analysis can, however, be difficult since a particular pathogen can cause variable MRI findings across different geographic environments, and conversely, a particular appearance on MRI may be caused by a variety of pathogens. This educational review aims to identify some of the key MRI patterns seen in paediatric brain infections and present example cases encountered in Western Australia. Based on (i) the predominant type of signal abnormality (restricted diffusion versus T2 hyperintensity) and (ii) the distribution of signal abnormality throughout the brain, this review presents a framework of six key MRI patterns seen in paediatric brain infections, with an emphasis on acute infectious encephalitis. There is general utility to these MRI patterns-each suggestive of a group of likely diagnostic possibilities which can be calibrated according to institution and local environment. The pattern-based framework of this review can be easily transitioned into daily radiological practice, and we hope it facilitates the formation of accurate differential diagnoses in paediatric brain infections.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.