ArticleEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2023
Mitigating bias in deep learning for diagnosis of coronary artery disease from myocardial perfusion SPECT images.
Article in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Comparing machine learning models and traditional approaches for predicting obstructive coronary artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Pooled it
- A Novel Quantitative Analysis in Myocardial Perfusion Imaging: How does it compare to the "Golden Eye"?Zeitschrift fur medizinische Physik · 2026Article
- Ethical Considerations in Patient Privacy and Data Handling for AI in Cardiovascular Imaging and Radiology.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Review
- Deep learning-based obstructive coronary artery disease prediction from myocardial perfusion SPECT.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026Article
- Machine learning and multi-omics technologies for precision cardiovascular medicine: advancing diagnosis, risk prediction, and therapeutic guidance.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Creation of a Standardized Myocardial Perfusion Single-photon Emission Computed Tomography Database to Enhance Coronary Artery Disease Research.Journal of medical signals and sensors · 2026Article
- Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Nuclear Cardiology.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Cross-institutional validation of a polar map-free 3D deep learning model for obstructive coronary artery disease prediction using myocardial perfusion imaging: insights into generalizability and bias.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence-powered coronary artery disease diagnosis from SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging: a comprehensive deep learning study.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025Article
- AI in SPECT Imaging: Opportunities and Challenges.Seminars in nuclear medicine · 2025Review
- Artificial Intelligence-Enhanced Perfusion Scoring Improves the Diagnostic Accuracy of Myocardial Perfusion Imaging.Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2025Article
- Non-invasive Assessment of Coronary Artery Disease: The Role of AI in the Current Status and Future Directions.Cureus · 2025Review
- Artificial intelligence for cardiac imaging is ready for widespread clinical use: Pro Con debate AI for cardiac imaging.BJR open · 2025Review
- The role of deep learning in myocardial perfusion imaging for diagnosis and prognosis: A systematic review.iScience · 2024Review
- Implications of Bias in Artificial Intelligence: Considerations for Cardiovascular Imaging.Current atherosclerosis reports · 2024Review
- Deep learning-enhanced nuclear medicine SPECT imaging applied to cardiac studies.EJNMMI physics · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
22 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeArtificial intelligence (AI) has high diagnostic accuracy for coronary artery disease (CAD) from myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI). However, when trained using high-risk populations (such as patients with correlating invasive testing), the disease probability can be overestimated due to selection bias. We evaluated different strategies for training AI models to improve the calibration (accurate estimate of disease probability), using external testing.
methodsDeep learning was trained using 828 patients from 3 sites, with MPI and invasive angiography within 6 months. Perfusion was assessed using upright (U-TPD) and supine total perfusion deficit (S-TPD). AI training without data augmentation (model 1) was compared to training with augmentation (increased sampling) of patients without obstructive CAD (model 2), and patients without CAD and TPD < 2% (model 3). All models were tested in an external population of patients with invasive angiography within 6 months (n = 332) or low likelihood of CAD (n = 179).
resultsModel 3 achieved the best calibration (Brier score 0.104 vs 0.121, p < 0.01). Improvement in calibration was particularly evident in women (Brier score 0.084 vs 0.124, p < 0.01). In external testing (n = 511), the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was higher for model 3 (0.930), compared to U-TPD (AUC 0.897) and S-TPD (AUC 0.900, p < 0.01 for both).
conclusionTraining AI models with augmentation of low-risk patients can improve calibration of AI models developed to identify patients with CAD, allowing more accurate assignment of disease probability. This is particularly important in lower-risk populations and in women, where overestimation of disease probability could significantly influence down-stream patient management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.