Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36194179›Full record

SynthesisNeurogastroenterology and motility2023

Systematic review of small intestine pacing parameters for modulation of gut function.

Nipuni D Nagahawatte, Leo K Cheng, Recep Avci, Timothy R Angeli-Gordon, Niranchan Paskaranandavadivel

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Neurogastroenterology and motility, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Methods and Techniques for Closed-Loop Gastrointestinal Pacing.Neurogastroenterology and motility · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Influence of isoflurane and propofol on gastric slow wave patterns and pacing efficacy in pigs.American journal of physiology. Gastrointestinal and liver physiology · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Nipuni D NagahawatteAuckland Bioengineering Institute, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-1409-447X
Leo K ChengAuckland Bioengineering Institute, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0003-2426-8987
Recep AvciAuckland Bioengineering Institute, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0003-2652-2192
Timothy R Angeli-GordonAuckland Bioengineering Institute, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Niranchan PaskaranandavadivelAuckland Bioengineering Institute, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0001-7377-8524
University of Auckland · NZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeThe efficacy of conventional treatments for severe and chronic functional motility disorders remains limited. High-energy pacing is a promising alternative therapy for patients that fail conventional treatment. Pacing primarily regulates gut motility by modulating rhythmic bio-electrical events called slow waves. While the efficacy of this technique has been widely investigated on the stomach, its application in the small intestine is less developed. This systematic review was undertaken to summarize the status of small intestinal pacing and evaluate its efficacy in modulating bowel function through preclinical research studies.

methodsThe literature was searched using Scopus, PubMed, Ovid, Cochrane, CINAHL, and Google Scholar. Studies investigating electrophysiological, motility, and/or nutrient absorption responses to pacing were included. A critical review of all included studies was conducted comparing study outcomes against experimental protocols.

resultsThe inclusion criteria were met by 34 publications. A range of pacing parameters including amplitude, pulse width, pacing direction, and its application to broad regional small intestinal segments were identified and assessed. Out of the 34 studies surveyed, 20/23 studies successfully achieved slow-wave entrainment, 9/11 studies enhanced nutrient absorption and 21/27 studies modulated motility with pacing.

conclusionSmall intestine pacing shows therapeutic potential in treating disorders such as short bowel syndrome and obesity. This systematic review proposes standardized protocols to maximize research outcomes and thereby translate to human studies for clinical validation. The use of novel techniques such as high-resolution electrical, manometric, and optical mapping in future studies will enable a mechanistic understanding of pacing.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MotilityIntestine, SmallElectric StimulationHumansStomachneuromodulationpacingslow wavessmall bowel motilitystimulation

Identifiers

PMID36194179
PMCPMC10078404
OpenAlexW4301182629

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.