ReviewJournal of biomechanical engineering2022
Neural Network Approaches for Soft Biological Tissue and Organ Simulations.
Review in Journal of biomechanical engineering, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Physics-Informed Machine Learning in Biomedical Science and Engineering.Annual review of biomedical engineering · 2026Review
- A Review of Finite Element Analysis in Spine Surgery Decision-Making.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Rapid prediction of cardiac activation in the left ventricle with geometric deep learning: a step towards cardiac resynchronization therapy planning.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- 3D Microscale Mechanical Simulations of Hydrogel Coated Electrospun Meshes.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- ValveFit: An analysis-suitable B-spline-based surface fitting framework for patient-specific modeling of tricuspid valves.Computer methods in applied mechanics and engineering · 2026Article
- Article
- Differential effects of demographics and risk factors on the nonlinear orthotropic mechanical properties of human femoropopliteal arteries.Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology · 2025Article
- Development and calibration of digital twins for human skin growth in tissue expansion.Acta biomaterialia · 2025Article
- Development and calibration of digital twins for human skin growth in tissue expansion.Acta biomaterialia · 2025Article
- Development and calibration of digital twins for human skin growth in tissue expansion.Acta biomaterialia · 2025Article
- A Neural Network Finite Element Trileaflet Heart Valve Model Incorporating Multi-Body Contact.International journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering · 2025Article
- Generative Hyperelasticity with Physics-Informed Probabilistic Diffusion Fields.Engineering with computers · 2025Article
- Rapid estimation of left ventricular contractility with a physics-informed neural network inverse modeling approach.Artificial intelligence in medicine · 2024Article
- Efficacy of the finite element analysis in assessing the effects of light curing on the mechanical properties of direct restorative composites: A systematic review.Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Given the functional complexities of soft tissues and organs, it is clear that computational simulations are critical in their understanding and for the rational basis for the development of therapies and replacements. A key aspect of such simulations is accounting for their complex, nonlinear, anisotropic mechanical behaviors. While soft tissue material models have developed to the point of high fidelity, in-silico implementation is typically done using the finite element (FE) method, which remains impractically slow for translational clinical time frames. As a potential path toward addressing the development of high fidelity simulations capable of performing in clinically relevant time frames, we review the use of neural networks (NN) for soft tissue and organ simulation using two approaches. In the first approach, we show how a NN can learn the responses for a detailed meso-structural soft tissue material model. The NN material model not only reproduced the full anisotropic mechanical responses but also demonstrated a considerable efficiency improvement, as it was trained over a range of realizable fibrous structures. In the second approach, we go a step further with the use of a physics-based surrogate model to directly learn the displacement field solution without the need for raw training data or FE simulation datasets. In this approach we utilize a finite element mesh to define the domain and perform the necessary integrations, but not the finite element method (FEM) itself. We demonstrate with this approach, termed neural network finite element (NNFE), results in a trained NNFE model with excellent agreement with the corresponding "ground truth" FE solutions over the entire physiological deformation range on a cuboidal myocardium specimen. More importantly, the NNFE approach provided a significantly decreased computational time for a range of finite element mesh sizes. Specifically, as the FE mesh size increased from 2744 to 175,615 elements, the NNFE computational time increased from 0.1108 s to 0.1393 s, while the "ground truth" FE model increased from 4.541 s to 719.9 s, with the same effective accuracy. These results suggest that NNFE run times are significantly reduced compared with the traditional large-deformation-based finite element solution methods. We then show how a nonuniform rational B-splines (NURBS)-based approach can be directly integrated into the NNFE approach as a means to handle real organ geometries. While these and related approaches are in their early stages, they offer a method to perform complex organ-level simulations in clinically relevant time frames without compromising accuracy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.