ArticleDiabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy2022
Simple Method to Predict Insulin Resistance in Children Aged 6-12 Years by Using Machine Learning.
Article in Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Explainable Clinical Decision Support for Metabolic Index Prediction in Gout Patients Using GA-Optimized Ensemble Learning Models.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Assessment of Machine Learning Model Performance for Clinical Prediction of Insulin Resistance in the Study of Cardiovascular Risk in Adolescents-ERICA.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Applying machine learning to predict quality ANC determinants in Bangladesh: a BDHS-2022 cross-sectional study.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Identifying determinants of malnutrition in under-five children in Bangladesh: insights from the BDHS-2022 cross-sectional study.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Development and validation of an insulin resistance prediction model in children and adolescents using machine learning algorithms.Translational pediatrics · 2025Article
- Discriminating insulin resistance in middle-aged nondiabetic women using machine learning approaches.AIMS public health · 2024Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Due to the increasing insulin resistance (IR) in childhood, rates of diabetes and cardiovascular disease may rise in the future and seriously threaten the healthy development of children. Finding an easy way to predict IR in children can help pediatricians to identify these children in time and intervene appropriately, which is particularly important for practitioners in primary health care. Patients and Methods: Seventeen features from 503 children 6-12 years old were collected. We defined IR by HOMA-IR greater than 3.0, thus classifying children with IR and those without IR. Data were preprocessed by multivariate imputation and oversampling to resolve missing values and data imbalances; then, recursive feature elimination was applied to further select features of interest, and 5 machine learning methods-namely, logistic regression (LR), support vector machine (SVM), random forest (RF), extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), and gradient boosting with categorical features support (CatBoost)-were used for model training. We tested the trained models on an external test set containing information from 133 children, from which performance metrics were extracted and the optimal model was selected. Results: After feature selection, the numbers of chosen features for the LR, SVM, RF, XGBoost, and CatBoost models were 6, 9, 10, 14, and 6, respectively. Among them, glucose, waist circumference, and age were chosen as predictors by most of the models. Finally, all 5 models achieved good performance on the external test set. Both XGBoost and CatBoost had the same AUC (0.85), which was highest among those of all models. Their accuracy, sensitivity, precision, and F1 scores were also close, but the specificity of XGBoost reached 0.79, which was significantly higher than that of CatBoost, so XGBoost was chosen as the optimal model. Conclusion: The model developed herein has a good predictive ability for IR in children 6-12 years old and can be clinically applied to help pediatricians identify children with IR in a simple and inexpensive way.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.