Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36193511›Full record

ArticleClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2022

Prevalence of Asthenopia and Its Relationship with Electronic Screen Usage During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Jazan, Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Ismail Abuallut, Elham A Qumayi, Azah Jabir Mohana, Norah M Almalki, Majdah E Ghilan, Fatimah H Dallak, Sarah Mohammed Mahzari, Almoayad Makrami, Amal Tawhari, Reham Eissa Ajeebi and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Risk factor assessment of digital eye strain during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional survey.Medical hypothesis, discovery & innovation ophthalmology journal · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ismail AbuallutDepartment of Surgery, Ophthalmology Division, College of Medicine, Jazan University, Jazan, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0003-1316-9465
Elham A QumayiCollege of Medicine, Jazan University, Jazan, Saudi Arabia.
Azah Jabir MohanaJazan University Hospital, Jazan University, Jazan, Saudi Arabia.
Norah M AlmalkiCollege of Medicine, Jazan University, Jazan, Saudi Arabia.
Majdah E GhilanCollege of Medicine, Jazan University, Jazan, Saudi Arabia.
Fatimah H DallakCollege of Medicine, Jazan University, Jazan, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0003-1446-6007
Sarah Mohammed MahzariCollege of Medicine, Jazan University, Jazan, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0001-9911-9041
Almoayad MakramiOphthalmology Department, Prince Mohammed bin Naser Hospital, Jazan, Saudi Arabia.
Amal TawhariCollege of Medicine, Jazan University, Jazan, Saudi Arabia.
Reham Eissa AjeebiCollege of Medicine, Jazan University, Jazan, Saudi Arabia.
Sultan Mousa BakriOphthalmology Department, Prince Mohammed bin Naser Hospital, Jazan, Saudi Arabia.
Jazan University · SAPrince Mohammed bin Abdulaziz Hospital · SA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To assess the connection between the prevalence of asthenopia and the use of electronic devices in Jazan, Saudi Arabia, during the COVID-19 pandemic. Patients and Methods: Asthenopia prevalence and its connection to electronic screens during the COVID-19 pandemic were evaluated in an analytical, cross-sectional investigation among the Jazan population. The sample population included 784 participants. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, a pre-tested, organized, and self-administered questionnaire was used as the study method. Social media invitations were used to contact the sample group. Results: Of the 784 participants, 587 (74.96%) had asthenopia symptoms after using digital devices at the end of the day. A total of 56.30% used digital gadgets for > 6 hours each day, whereas 55.36% spent <2 hours per day reading papers or books or writing. Daily usage of digital gadgets did not significantly differ from asthenopia (p=0.46), as well as reading papers, books, or writing and asthenopia (p=0.098). A total of 45.92% of the study population maintained digital devices/books at a distance <25 cm, which was significantly associated with symptoms of asthenopia (p=0.048). Furthermore, 90.10% of the sample population used laptops, cellphones, and iPads before going to bed or after turning off lights. A total of 63.52% preferred using devices while lying in bed. There was no positive link between asthenopia symptoms and cellphone usage at bedtime or after turning off lights (p=0.028). Conclusion: Digital technology is used by people of all ages for a wide range of daily activities, including education, employment, business, and recreation. We concluded that this group had a high prevalence of asthenopia, especially during the COVID-19 pandemic. The high frequency of asthenopia emphasizes the significance of conducting public awareness campaigns concerning asthenopia symptoms and prevention methods.

Indexed as

asthenopiacomputer vision syndromecoronavirus diseasemobile phonesvideo display terminals

Identifiers

PMID36193511
PMCPMC9526506
OpenAlexW4297369915

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.