Trial reportDisease markers2022
Efficacy of Laparoscopic Totally Extraperitoneal Repair for Inguinal Hernia.
Trial report in Disease markers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Postoperative urinary leakage after bilateral totally extraperitoneal herniorrhaphy in a patient with a healed cystostomy and appendectomy: A case report.The Journal of international medical research · 2023Article
- Retracted: Efficacy of Laparoscopic Totally Extraperitoneal Repair for Inguinal Hernia.Disease markers · 2023Article
- Laparoscopic versus Open Inguinal Hernia Repair in Aging Patients: A Propensity Score Matching-Based Retrospective Study.Therapeutics and clinical risk management · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Retraction · 2023-06-21Concerns/Issues about Data · Concerns/Issues about Results and/or Conclusions · Concerns/Issues about Referencing/Attributions · Concerns/Issues about Peer Review · Investigation by Journal/Publisher · Investigation by Third Party · Computer-Aided Content or Computer-Generated Content · Unreliable Results and/or Conclusions · · See also: https://pubpeer.com/publications/E5E5A1EDE4061696965A10A4E54DAD
- Retracted
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To assess the treatment efficacy of laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal repair for inguinal hernia. Methods: Between November 2018 and May 2020, 130 patients with inguinal hernias diagnosed and treated in our hospital were randomly recruited and assigned to receive either tension-free hernia repair (control group) or laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal repair (study group) at the random method. All patients received routine care including external traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) application. Outcome measures included surgical indices, numeric rating scale (NRS) scores, infections, and postoperative complications. Results: Laparoscopic surgery is associated with a shorter operation duration, time-lapse before postoperative off-bed activity, and hospital stay, as well as less intraoperative hemorrhage volume compared to tension-free hernia repair in the control group. Patients in the study group had considerably lower NRS ratings after therapy than those in the control group. ( Conclusion: Laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal repair for inguinal hernia improves the intraoperative indices, mitigates postoperative pain, and reduces the risks of infections and complications, with the advantages of short operation duration, less hemorrhage volume, and shorter hospital stay. It shows great potential for clinical promotion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.