Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36193443›Full record

ArticleIndustrial & engineering chemistry research2022

Evaluating the Role of Hydrophobic and Cationic Appendages on the Laundry Performance of Modified Hydroxyethyl Celluloses.

Marcellino D'Avino, Ruth Chilton, Si Gang, Mark R Sivik, David A Fulton

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Industrial & engineering chemistry research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Marcellino D'AvinoChemistry-School of Natural and Environmental Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 8QB, U.K.
Ruth ChiltonNewcastle Innovation Centre, The Procter & Gamble Company, Newcastle upon Tyne NE12 9TS, U.K.
Si GangNewcastle Innovation Centre, The Procter & Gamble Company, Newcastle upon Tyne NE12 9TS, U.K.
Mark R SivikFabric & Home Care Innovation Centre, The Procter & Gamble Company, Cincinnati, Ohio 45202, United States.
David A FultonChemistry-School of Natural and Environmental Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 8QB, U.K.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8698-0895
Newcastle University · GBProcter & Gamble (United Kingdom) · GBProcter & Gamble (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Soil-release polymers (SRPs) are essential additives of laundry detergents whose function is to enable soil release from fabric and to prevent soil redeposition during the washing cycle. The currently used SRPs are petrochemical-based; however, SRPs based on biorenewable polymers would be preferred from an environmental and regulatory perspective. To explore this possibility, we have synthesized SRPs based on hydroxyethyl cellulose (amphiphilic HEC) appended with controlled compositions of hydrophobic and cationic appendages and assessed their cleaning abilities. The results demonstrate that the introduction of hydrophobic lauryl appendages onto the HEC backbone is essential to deliver anti-redeposition and soil-release performance. Conversely, further introduction of cationic groups onto hydrophobic modified HECs had no clear impact on soil-release performance but caused significant disadvantages on anti-redeposition performance. We speculate that this poor performance arises on account of coacervation formation between the cationic HEC polymer and the anionic surfactant in the detergent, negatively impacting soil suspension and suggests that the inclusion of cationic appendages on HECs can ultimately lead to detrimental effects on performance. Interestingly, in contrast to conventional SPRs that exhibit good soil-release performance exclusively on synthetic fabrics, amphiphilic HEC displayed encouraging results on both synthetic and cotton-based textiles, possibly as a result of a good chemical affinity with natural fabrics. This work highlights that the nature and hydrophobic content of HEC ethers are key variables that govern HEC applicability as SRPs, thus paving the way for the design and synthesis of new SRPs.

Identifiers

PMID36193443
PMCPMC9523713
OpenAlexW4295665403

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.