ArticleJournal of food science and technology2022
Evaluating the ability of rapid evaporative ionization mass spectrometry to differentiate beef palatability based on consumer preference.
Article in Journal of food science and technology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Combining rapid evaporative ionization mass spectrometry and chemometrics for the differentiation of cocoa bean quality.Current research in food science · 2025Article
- Applications of ambient ionization mass spectrometry in 2022: An annual review.Analytical science advances · 2023Review
- Direct Ambient Mass Spectrometry for Food, Beverage, and Agricultural Sample Analysis and Research.Mass spectrometry reviewsReview
- Rapid, Sensitive, and Versatile: A 5-Year Perspective on Applications of Ambient Ionization Mass Spectrometry in Bioanalytical Science.Mass spectrometry reviewsReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rapid Evaporative Ionization Mass Spectrometry (REIMS) is a type of ambient ionization mass spectrometry, which enables real-time evaluation of several complex traits from a single measurement. The objective of this study was to evaluate the capability of REIMS analysis of raw samples coupled with chemometrics to accurately identify and predict cooked beef palatability. REIMS analysis and consumer sensory evaluation were conducted for beef arm center roasts (n = 20), top loin steaks (n = 20), top sirloin steaks (n = 20), and 20% lipid ground beef (n = 20). These data were used to train predictive models for six classification sets representing different sensory traits. The maximum prediction accuracies achieved (from high to low): beefy flavor acceptance (86.25%), juiciness acceptance (83.75%), overall acceptance (81.25%), overall flavor acceptance (81.25%), grilled flavor acceptance (78.75%), and tenderness acceptance (75%). The current study demonstrates that REIMS analysis of raw meat has the potential to predict and classify cooked beef palatability. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13197-022-05562-6.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.