Bacterial diversity of traditional fermented food,

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Integrating physicochemical and microbial characterization of red rice broth fermented over an 18-hour period augmented with metagenomic and metabolomic approaches.RSC advances · 2026
   Article
2. Probing the metagenome and nutritional composition of idli batter fortified with electrolytic iron for addressing anaemia.Journal of food science and technology · 2025
   Article
3. Complete Genome Sequence and In Vitro Probiotic Assessment of Bacillus subtilis DC-11 Isolated from Traditionally Fermented Idli Batter.Current microbiology · 2024
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

Indexed as