Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36193339›Full record

ArticleInternet interventions2022

Practitioner and researcher perspectives on the utility of ecological momentary assessment in mental health care: A survey study.

Maarten Piot, Merijn Mestdagh, Harriëtte Riese, Jeroen Weermeijer, Jannie M A Brouwer, Peter Kuppens, Egon Dejonckheere, Fionneke M Bos

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Internet interventions, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
10.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. The Potential of Personalized Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder Networks.Psychiatry and clinical psychopharmacology · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Opening the contextual black box: a case for idiographic experience sampling of context for clinical applications.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Maarten PiotFaculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Merijn MestdaghFaculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Harriëtte RieseUniversity of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Psychiatry, Interdisciplinary Center Psychopathology and Emotion regulation (ICPE), Groningen, the Netherlands.
Jeroen WeermeijerCenter for Contextual Psychiatry, Department of Neurosciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Jannie M A BrouwerUniversity of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Psychiatry, Interdisciplinary Center Psychopathology and Emotion regulation (ICPE), Groningen, the Netherlands.
Peter KuppensFaculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Egon DejonckheereFaculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Fionneke M BosUniversity of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Psychiatry, Interdisciplinary Center Psychopathology and Emotion regulation (ICPE), Groningen, the Netherlands.
KU Leuven · BEUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Ecological momentary assessment (EMA) is a scientific self-monitoring method to capture individuals' daily life experiences. Early on, EMA has been suggested to have the potential to improve mental health care. However, it remains unclear if and how EMA should be implemented. This requires an in-depth investigation of how practitioners and researchers view the implementation of EMA. Objective: Explore the perspectives of mental health practitioners and EMA researchers on the utility of EMA for mental health care. Methods: Practitioners ( Results: Practitioners and researchers considered EMA to be a useful clinical tool for diverse stages of care. They indicated EMA to be most useful for gaining insight into the context specificity of symptoms (55.0 %), whereas receiving alerts when symptoms increase was rated the least useful (11.3 %, alerts is in 95 % of bootstrap iterations between rank 8 and 10). Compared to treatment-as-usual, EMA was considered easier to use ( Conclusions: This survey study demonstrated that practitioners and researchers expect EMA to have added value for mental health care. Concrete recommendations for implementation of EMA are formulated. This may inform the development of specific clinical applications and user-friendly EMA software.

Indexed as

Blended careClinical implementationEcological momentary assessmente-HealthExperience samplingPersonalized psychiatry

Identifiers

PMID36193339
PMCPMC9526140
OpenAlexW4297216083

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.