Article in BioMed research international, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registry
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
3 · Its place in the literature
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what money
Authors and funding
11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Pamela Félix da SilvaExperimental Pathophysiology Laboratory (LAFEx), Biological Sciences Department (DECBI), Research Center in Biological Sciences (NUPEB), Federal University of Ouro Preto (UFOP), Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3885-0356
Natália Alves de MatosExperimental Pathophysiology Laboratory (LAFEx), Biological Sciences Department (DECBI), Research Center in Biological Sciences (NUPEB), Federal University of Ouro Preto (UFOP), Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2535-2737
Camila de Oliveira RamosExperimental Pathophysiology Laboratory (LAFEx), Biological Sciences Department (DECBI), Research Center in Biological Sciences (NUPEB), Federal University of Ouro Preto (UFOP), Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9815-1370
Thalles de Freitas CastroExperimental Pathophysiology Laboratory (LAFEx), Biological Sciences Department (DECBI), Research Center in Biological Sciences (NUPEB), Federal University of Ouro Preto (UFOP), Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8102-7720
Natália Pereira da Silva AraújoExperimental Pathophysiology Laboratory (LAFEx), Biological Sciences Department (DECBI), Research Center in Biological Sciences (NUPEB), Federal University of Ouro Preto (UFOP), Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9542-871X
Ana Beatriz Farias de SouzaExperimental Pathophysiology Laboratory (LAFEx), Biological Sciences Department (DECBI), Research Center in Biological Sciences (NUPEB), Federal University of Ouro Preto (UFOP), Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5226-6378
Guilherme de Paula CostaImmunobiology of Inflammation Laboratory (LABIIN), Biological Sciences Department (DECBI), Research Center in Biological Sciences (NUPEB), Federal University of Ouro Preto (UFOP), Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3817-3858
Sílvia Dantas CangussúExperimental Pathophysiology Laboratory (LAFEx), Biological Sciences Department (DECBI), Research Center in Biological Sciences (NUPEB), Federal University of Ouro Preto (UFOP), Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1061-6445
André TalvaniImmunobiology of Inflammation Laboratory (LABIIN), Biological Sciences Department (DECBI), Research Center in Biological Sciences (NUPEB), Federal University of Ouro Preto (UFOP), Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6685-6229
Akinori Cardozo NagatoImmunopathology Laboratory and Experimental Pathology, Reproductive Biology Center (CRB), Federal University of Juiz de Fora, Minas Gerais, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7398-0834
Frank Silva BezerraExperimental Pathophysiology Laboratory (LAFEx), Biological Sciences Department (DECBI), Research Center in Biological Sciences (NUPEB), Federal University of Ouro Preto (UFOP), Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0804-5196
Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto · BRUniversidade Federal de Juiz de Fora · BR
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
6 · The paper itself
Abstract
Cigarette smoking throughout life causes serious health issues in the lungs. The electronic cigarette (E-Cig) use increased, since it was first introduced in the world. This research work compared the short-term exposure consequences to e-cigarette vapor and cigarette smoke in male mice. Forty-five C57BL/6 mice were randomized into control (C) in an ambient air exposition cigarette smoke (CS) and aerosol electronic cigarette (EC), both were exposed to 120 puffs, 3 times/day during five days. Then, in the experimental protocol, the euthanized mice had their tissues removed for analysis. Our study showed that CS and EC resulted in higher cell influx into the airways, and an increase in macrophage counts in CS (209.25 ± 7.41) and EC (220.32 ± 8.15) when compared to C (108.40 ± 4.49) (
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.
Acute Outcomes of Cigarette Smoke and Electronic Cigarette Aerosol Inhalation in a Murine Model. · full record | OpenQuestion