ArticleContraception: X2022
Pregnancy coercion and partner knowledge of contraceptive use among Ethiopian women.
Article in Contraception: X, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Rural-Urban Differences in the Association Between Reproductive Coercion and Postpartum Family Planning.Studies in family planning · 2026Article
- Prevalence and correlates of reproductive coercion in the months before pregnancy: cross-sectional findings from pregnant women in Ethiopia.Reproductive health · 2025Article
- Short interpregnancy interval following reproductive coercion: A prospective cohort study of pregnant Ethiopian women.Pregnancy (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2025Article
- Longitudinal impact of past-year reproductive coercion on contraceptive use dynamics in Sub-Saharan Africa: evidence from eight population-based cohorts.EClinicalMedicine · 2025Article
- A qualitative exploration of reproductive coercion experiences and perceptions in four geo-culturally diverse sub-Saharan African settings.SSM. Qualitative research in health · 2024Article
- Differential discontinuation by covert use status in Kenya.Contraception: X · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To examine the relationship between pregnancy coercion and partner knowledge of contraceptive use. Study design: Cross-sectional Performance Monitoring for Action-Ethiopia data were collected in October-November 2019 from a nationally representative sample of women ages 15 to 49. The analytical sample ( Results: Most women reported their partner knew they were using contraception and had discussed use prior to method initiation (1,837/2,469, 75%); 16% used overtly and discussed use after method initiation, and 7% used contraception covertly. The proportion of covert users increased with pregnancy coercion severity (4% Conclusion: When experiencing pregnancy coercion, women may avoid or delay contraceptive conversations with their partners. Increased pregnancy coercion severity has the greatest association with covert use and couple contraceptive discussions. Implications: The presence and timing of couple discussions about contraception are critical for ensuring safety for women experiencing pregnancy coercion. Screening for pregnancy coercion must be included within contraceptive counseling so that women can choose methods that maximize their reproductive autonomy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.