Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36193238›Full record

ArticleJournal of cloud computing (Heidelberg, Germany)2022

Cloud based evaluation of databases for stock market data.

Baldeep Singh, Randall Martyr, Thomas Medland, Jamie Astin, Gordon Hunter, Jean-Christophe Nebel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cloud computing (Heidelberg, Germany), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Baldeep SinghSchool of Computer Science and Mathematics, Kingston University, London, KT1 2EE UK.
Randall MartyrSchool of Computer Science and Mathematics, Kingston University, London, KT1 2EE UK.
Thomas MedlandInstinet Global Services Limited, 1 Angel Lane, London, EC4R 3AB UK.
Jamie AstinInstinet Global Services Limited, 1 Angel Lane, London, EC4R 3AB UK.
Gordon HunterSchool of Computer Science and Mathematics, Kingston University, London, KT1 2EE UK.
Jean-Christophe NebelSchool of Computer Science and Mathematics, Kingston University, London, KT1 2EE UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

About fifty years ago, the world's first fully automated system for trading securities was introduced by Instinet in the US. Since then the world of trading has been revolutionised by the introduction of electronic markets and automatic order execution. Nowadays, financial institutions exploit the associated flow of daily data using more and more advanced analytics to gain valuable insight on the markets and inform their investment decisions. In particular, time series of Open High Low Close prices and Volume data are of special interest as they allow identifying trading patterns useful for forecasting both stock prices and volumes. Traditionally, relational databases have been used to store this data; however, the ever-growing volume of this data, the adoption of the hybrid cloud model, and the availability of novel non-relational databases which claim to be more scalable and fault tolerant raise the question whether relational databases are still the most appropriate. In this study, we define a set of criteria to evaluate performance of a variety of databases on a hybrid cloud environment. There, we conduct experiments using standard and custom workloads. Results show that migration to a MongoDB database would be most beneficial in terms of cost, storage space, and throughput. In addition, organisations wishing to take advantage of autoscaling and the maintenance power of the cloud should opt for a cloud native solution.

Indexed as

Big dataCloud databasesDistributed storageHybrid cloudOHLC data

Identifiers

PMID36193238
PMCPMC9520093

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.