Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36193205›Full record

ArticleEducation and information technologies2023

Advances and challenges in the detection of academic stress and anxiety in the classroom: A literature review and recommendations.

Laura P Jiménez-Mijangos, Jorge Rodríguez-Arce, Rigoberto Martínez-Méndez, José Javier Reyes-Lagos

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Education and information technologies, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Wearables for Stress Management: A Scoping Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Laura P Jiménez-MijangosFacultad de Ingeniería, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México, Avenida Universidad, Toluca, 50100 Estado de México México.
Jorge Rodríguez-ArceFacultad de Ingeniería, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México, Avenida Universidad, Toluca, 50100 Estado de México México.ORCID 0000-0003-0289-7061
Rigoberto Martínez-Méndez *Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México, Avenida Universidad, Toluca, 50100 Estado de México México.
José Javier Reyes-Lagos *Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México, Paseo Tollocan, Toluca, 50180 Estado de México México.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, stress and anxiety have been identified as two of the leading causes of academic underachievement and dropout. However, there is little work on the detection of stress and anxiety in academic settings and/or its impact on the performance of undergraduate students. Moreover, there is a gap in the literature in terms of identifying any computing, information technologies, or technological platforms that help educational institutions to identify students with mental health problems. This paper aims to systematically review the literature to identify the advances, limitations, challenges, and possible lines of research for detecting academic stress and anxiety in the classroom. Forty-four recent articles on the topic of detecting stress and anxiety in academic settings were analyzed. The results show that the main tools used for detecting anxiety and stress are psychological instruments such as self-questionnaires. The second most used method is acquiring and analyzing biological signals and biomarkers using commercial measurement instruments. Data analysis is mainly performed using descriptive statistical tools and pattern recognition techniques. Specifically, physiological signals are combined with classification algorithms. The results of this method for detecting anxiety and academic stress in students are encouraging. Using physiological signals reduces some of the limitations of psychological instruments, such as response time and self-report bias. Finally, the main challenge in the detection of academic anxiety and stress is to bring detection systems into the classroom. Doing so, requires the use of non-invasive sensors and wearable systems to reduce the intrinsic stress caused by instrumentation.

Indexed as

Academic stressEducation and anxietyImprovement in learningStudent behavior

Identifiers

PMID36193205
PMCPMC9517993

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.