ArticleComputational intelligence and neuroscience2022
Intelligent Identification of Coal Crack in CT Images Based on Deep Learning.
Article in Computational intelligence and neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Automatic segmentation of coal crack in CT images is of great significance for the establishment of digital cores. In addition, segmentation in this field remains challenging due to some properties of coal crack CT images: high noise, small targets, unbalanced positive and negative samples, and complex, diverse backgrounds. In this paper, a segmentation method of coal crack CT images is proposed and a dataset of coal crack CT images is established. Based on the semantic segmentation model DeepLabV3+ of deep learning, the OS of the backbone has been modified to 8, and the ASPP module rate has also been modified. A new loss function is defined by combining CE loss and Dice loss. This deep learning method avoids the problem of manually setting thresholds in traditional threshold segmentation and can automatically and intelligently extract cracks. Besides, the proposed model has 0.1%, 1.2%, 2.9%, and 0.5% increase in Acc, mAcc, MioU, and FWIoU compared with other techniques and has 0.1%, 0.8%, 2%, and 0.4% increase compared with the original DeepLabV3+ on the dataset of coal CT images. The obtained results denote that the proposed segmentation method outperforms existing crack detection techniques and have practical application value in safety engineering.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.