Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36193179›Full record

ArticleHealth services & outcomes research methodology2022

Building staff capability, opportunity, and motivation to provide smoking cessation to people with cancer in Australian cancer treatment centres: development of an implementation intervention framework for the Care to Quit cluster randomised controlled trial.

Annika Ryan, Alison Luk Young, Jordan Tait, Kristen McCarter, Melissa McEnallay, Fiona Day, James McLennan, Catherine Segan, Gillian Blanchard, Laura Healey and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health services & outcomes research methodology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Annika RyanSchool of Medicine and Public Health, College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW Australia.
Alison Luk YoungSchool of Medicine and Public Health, College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW Australia.
Jordan TaitSchool of Medicine and Public Health, College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW Australia.
Kristen McCarterSchool of Medicine and Public Health, College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW Australia.
Melissa McEnallaySchool of Medicine and Public Health, College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW Australia.
Fiona DaySchool of Medicine and Public Health, College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW Australia.
James McLennanSt Vincent's Hospital Sydney, 390 Victoria Street, Darlinghurst, NSW 2010 Australia.
Catherine SeganCancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, VIC Australia.
Gillian BlanchardCalvary Mater Newcastle, Corner Edith and Platt Streets, Waratah, NSW 2289 Australia.
Laura HealeyCalvary Mater Newcastle, Corner Edith and Platt Streets, Waratah, NSW 2289 Australia.
Sandra AverySouth Western Sydney Local Health District, Elizabeth Street, Liverpool, NSW 2170 Australia.
Sarah WhiteDepartment of Health Quitline, 615 St Kilda Rd, Melbourne, VIC 3004 Australia.
Shalini VinodCancer Therapy Centre, Liverpool Hospital, Liverpool, NSW Australia.
Linda BradfordThe Alfred, 55 Commercial Rd, Melbourne, VIC 3004 Australia.
Christine L PaulSchool of Medicine and Public Health, College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0504-5246

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Few rigorous studies provide a clear description of the methodological approach of developing an evidence-based implementation intervention, prior to implementation at scale. This study describes the development, mapping, rating, and review of the implementation strategies for the Care to Quit smoking cessation trial, prior to application in nine cancer services across Australia. Key stakeholders were engaged in the process from conception through to rating, reviewing and refinement of strategies and principles. An initial scoping review identified 21 barriers to provision of evidence-based smoking cessation care to patients with cancer, which were mapped to the Theoretical Domains Framework and Behaviour Change Wheel (BCW) to identify relevant intervention functions. The mapping identified 26 relevant behaviour change techniques, summarised into 11 implementation strategies. The implementation strategies were rated and reviewed against the BCW Affordability, Practicality, Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness, Acceptability, Side-effects/safety, and Equity criteria by key stakeholders during two interactive workshops to facilitate a focus on feasible interventions likely to resonate with clinical staff. The implementation strategies and associated intervention tools were then collated by form and function to provide a practical guide for implementing the intervention. This study illustrates the rigorous use of theories and frameworks to arrive at a practical intervention guide, with potential to inform future replication and scalability of evidence-based implementation across a range of health service settings. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10742-022-00288-6.

Indexed as

3As model of careBehavioural frameworkCancer careImplementationIntervention mappingSmoking cessation

Identifiers

PMID36193179
PMCPMC9517978

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.