Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36193165›Full record

ArticleJournal of pain research2022

Outcomes and Predictors of Response of Duloxetine for the Treatment of Persistent Idiopathic Dentoalveolar Pain: A Retrospective Multicenter Observational Study.

Zipu Jia, Jinyong Yu, Chunmei Zhao, Hao Ren, Fang Luo

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pain research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Diagnosis and management of persistent idiopathic facial pain following dental procedures: a retrospective study.Journal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Zipu JiaDepartment of Day Surgery Center; Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Jinyong YuDepartment of Pain Management; Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Chunmei ZhaoDepartment of Pain Management; Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0001-7734-4192
Hao RenDepartment of Pain Management; Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0001-7422-2237
Fang LuoDepartment of Pain Management; Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0002-3584-0355
Capital Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Duloxetine has been reported to significantly relieve the pain of persistent idiopathic dentoalveolar pain (PIDP); however, the number of studies available is scarce and no study has identified the predictors of response of duloxetine for the treatment of PIDP. Objective: To report the efficacy, safety, and identification of positive predictors of duloxetine for PIDP patients through a retrospective multicenter observational study. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the clinical database of PIDP patients who were prescribed duloxetine at 3 hospitals between January 2018 and November 2021. Demographic and pain-related baseline data, efficacy of patients after 3 months of medication by visual analog scale (VAS) scores for pain and adverse events were extracted and analyzed. The predictors of pain-relieving effect of duloxetine were identified by logistic regression analysis. Results: A total of 135 patients were included in this study. Side effects occurred immediately after taking duloxetine in 24 (17.8%) patients, and the treatment with duloxetine was discontinued on 13 of them because they could not tolerate the side effects. Other 11 (8.1%) patients gradually tolerated the side effects within 2 weeks. Ninety-four out of 122 (77.0%) patients obtained pain relief with VAS significantly decreased (p < 0.01) and the other 28 (23.0%) patients stopped taking the drug because of weak efficacy. Binary logistic regression analysis showed that short disease duration (OR = 1.017, 95% CI = 1.004-1.030, P = 0.012) was an independent predictor of the positive response of duloxetine. Conclusion: This study confirmed that duloxetine can significantly improve chronic pain of PIDP patients, and the safety was tolerable. Patients with shorter disease duration had more benefit from duloxetine. Limitations: This is a retrospective observational study. Long-term efficacy and safety of duloxetine in the treatment of PIDP patients were not evaluated.

Indexed as

duloxetineefficacypersistent idiopathic dentoalveolar painpredictor of responsesafety

Identifiers

PMID36193165
PMCPMC9526422
OpenAlexW4297405137

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.