ArticleEvidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM2022
Efficacy Evaluation of High-Volume Hemofiltration in Patients with Severe Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome.
Article in Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Retracted: Efficacy Evaluation of High-Volume Hemofiltration in Patients with Severe Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Retraction · 2023-09-27Concerns/Issues about Data · Concerns/Issues about Results and/or Conclusions · Concerns/Issues about Referencing/Attributions · Concerns/Issues about Peer Review · Investigation by Journal/Publisher · Investigation by Third Party · Paper Mill · Computer-Aided Content or Computer-Generated Content · Unreliable Results and/or Conclusions · · See also: https://pubpeer.com/publications/696F6BE376DDCF13A82BC9347B51C6
- Retracted
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the efficacy of high-volume hemofiltration (HVHF) in the treatment of severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) caused by sepsis and its effect on serum levels of miR-126, miR-184, and MAP1-LC3. Methods: From July 1, 2015 to December 31, 2021, patients with severe ARDS caused by sepsis who were admitted to our hospital were retrospectively analyzed. Patients who received conventional treatment were summarized into the control group, and those who received HVHF were summarized into the study group. The treatment effects of the two groups were compared. Results: Ninety-five qualified patients were retrieved, with 42 patients in the control group and 53 patients in the study group. After treatment, the levels of IL-6, IL-10, TNF- Conclusion: HVHF has a good clinical effect on improving patients with severe ARDS caused by sepsis and can improve the pulmonary function of patients.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.