Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36193047›Full record

ArticleiScience2022

Dimensionality reduction by UMAP for visualizing and aiding in classification of imaging flow cytometry data.

Ireneusz Stolarek, Anna Samelak-Czajka, Marek Figlerowicz, Paulina Jackowiak

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in iScience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Systems biology of B cells in COVID-19.Seminars in immunology · 2024
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ireneusz StolarekInstitute of Bioorganic Chemistry Polish Academy of Sciences, Noskowskiego 12/14, 61-704 Poznań, Poland.
Anna Samelak-CzajkaInstitute of Bioorganic Chemistry Polish Academy of Sciences, Noskowskiego 12/14, 61-704 Poznań, Poland.
Marek FiglerowiczInstitute of Bioorganic Chemistry Polish Academy of Sciences, Noskowskiego 12/14, 61-704 Poznań, Poland.
Paulina JackowiakInstitute of Bioorganic Chemistry Polish Academy of Sciences, Noskowskiego 12/14, 61-704 Poznań, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent advances in imaging flow cytometry (IFC) have revolutionized high-throughput multiparameter analyses at single-cell resolution. Although enabling the discovery of population heterogeneities and the detection of rare events, IFC generates hyperdimensional datasets that demand innovative analytical approaches. Current methods work in a supervised manner, utilize only limited information content, or require large annotated reference datasets. Dimensionality reduction algorithms, including uniform manifold approximation and projection (UMAP), have been successfully applied to analyze the large number of parameters generated in various high-throughput techniques. Here, we apply a workflow incorporating UMAP to analyze different IFC datasets. We demonstrate that it out-competes other popular dimensionality reduction methods in speed and accuracy. Moreover, it enables fast visualization, clustering, and tagging of unannotated objects in large-scale experiments. We anticipate that our workflow will be a robust method to address complex IFC datasets, either alone or as an upstream addition to the deep learning approaches.

Indexed as

Automation in bioinformaticsBioinformaticsCell biology

Identifiers

PMID36193047
PMCPMC9526149

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.