Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36192785›Full record

ArticleImplementation science : IS2022

Comparing two implementation strategies for implementing and sustaining a case management practice serving homeless-experienced veterans: a protocol for a type 3 hybrid cluster-randomized trial.

Sonya Gabrielian, Erin P Finley, David A Ganz, Jenny M Barnard, Nicholas J Jackson, Ann Elizabeth Montgomery, Richard E Nelson, Kristina M Cordasco

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Implementation science : IS, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05312229 (Implementing and Sustaining Critical Time Intervention), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05312229 phase1recruitingnot on this map

Implementing and Sustaining Critical Time Intervention (CTI) in Case Management Programs for Homeless-experienced Veterans (PII 21-285)

TypeinterventionalSponsorVA Office of Research and DevelopmentRan2021 to 2026Enrolled153ConditionsHomelessnessArmsCritical Time Intervention, External Facilitation, Replicating Effective Programs
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Sonya GabrielianHSR&D Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation and Policy (CSHIIP), VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, North Hills, CA, USA. sonya.gabrielian@va.gov.ORCID 0000-0002-1790-4271
Erin P FinleyHSR&D Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation and Policy (CSHIIP), VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, North Hills, CA, USA.
David A GanzHSR&D Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation and Policy (CSHIIP), VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, North Hills, CA, USA.
Jenny M BarnardHSR&D Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation and Policy (CSHIIP), VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, North Hills, CA, USA.
Nicholas J JacksonHSR&D Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation and Policy (CSHIIP), VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, North Hills, CA, USA.
Ann Elizabeth MontgomeryBirmingham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Richard E NelsonVeterans Affairs Salt Lake City Health Care System, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Kristina M CordascoHSR&D Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation and Policy (CSHIIP), VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, North Hills, CA, USA.
University of California, Los Angeles · USCenter for the Study of Healthcare Provider Behavior · USThe University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio · USUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham · USUniversity of Utah · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Veterans Health Administration (VA) Grant and Per Diem case management "aftercare" program provides 6 months of case management for homeless-experienced veterans (HEVs) undergoing housing transitions. To standardize and improve aftercare services, we will implement critical time intervention (CTI), an evidence-based, structured, and time-limited case management practice. We will use two strategies to support the implementation and sustainment of CTI at 32 aftercare sites, conduct a mixed-methods evaluation of this implementation initiative, and generate a business case analysis and implementation playbook to support the continued spread and sustainment of CTI in aftercare.

methodsWe will use the Replicating Effective Programs (REP) implementation strategy to support CTI implementation at 32 sites selected by our partners. Half (n=16) of these sites will also receive 9 months of external facilitation (EF, enhanced REP). We will conduct a type 3 hybrid cluster-randomized trial to compare the impacts of REP versus enhanced REP. We will cluster potential sites into three implementation cohorts staggered in 9-month intervals. Within each cohort, we will use permuted block randomization to balance key site characteristics among sites receiving REP versus enhanced REP; sites will not be blinded to their assigned strategy. We will use mixed methods to assess the impacts of the implementation strategies. As fidelity to CTI influences its effectiveness, fidelity to CTI is our primary outcome, followed by sustainment, quality metrics, and costs. We hypothesize that enhanced REP will have higher costs than REP alone, but will result in stronger CTI fidelity, sustainment, and quality metrics, leading to a business case for enhanced REP. This work will lead to products that will support our partners in spreading and sustaining CTI in aftercare. DISCUSSION: Implementing CTI within aftercare holds the potential to enhance HEVs' housing and health outcomes. Understanding effective strategies to support CTI implementation could assist with a larger CTI roll-out within aftercare and support the implementation of other case management practices within and outside VA.

trial registrationThis project was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov as "Implementing and sustaining Critical Time Intervention in case management programs for homeless-experienced Veterans." Trial registration NCT05312229 , registered April 4, 2022.

Indexed as

Ill-Housed PersonsVeteransCase ManagementHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicUnited StatesUnited States Department of Veterans AffairsCase managementFacilitationHomeless veteransImplementation scienceReplicating effective programs

Identifiers

PMID36192785
PMCPMC9527738
OpenAlexW4300865548

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.