Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36192769›Full record

ArticleTrials2022

Comparing the effectiveness of Family Support for Health Action (FAM-ACT) with traditional community health worker-led interventions to improve adult diabetes management and outcomes: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Denise J Deverts, Michele Heisler, Edith C Kieffer, Gretchen A Piatt, Felix Valbuena, Jonathan G Yabes, Claudia Guajardo, Deliana Ilarraza-Montalvo, Gloria Palmisano, Glory Koerbel and 1 more

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03812614 nacompletednot on this map

Comparative Effectiveness of Adding Family Supporter Training to a CHW-Led Intervention to Improve Behavioral Management of Multiple Risk Factors for Diabetes Complications

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of PittsburghRan2019 to 2023Enrolled444ConditionsDiabetes Mellitus, High Blood Pressure, High Blood Sugar, HypertensionArmsFAM ACT, I-DSMES
NCT05965869 naactive not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Creating Healthy Communities Through a Church-based, Community Health Worker-led Initiative

TypeinterventionalSponsorThe University of Texas Medical Branch, GalvestonRan2023 to 2028Enrolled400ConditionsDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Diabetes Mellitus RiskArmsdiabetes program
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Denise J DevertsUniversity of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. devertsdj@pitt.edu.
Michele HeislerUniversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Edith C KiefferUniversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Gretchen A PiattUniversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Felix ValbuenaCommunity Health and Social Services Center, Inc., Detroit, MI, USA.
Jonathan G YabesUniversity of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Claudia GuajardoCommunity Health and Social Services Center, Inc., Detroit, MI, USA.
Deliana Ilarraza-MontalvoCommunity Health and Social Services Center, Inc., Detroit, MI, USA.
Gloria PalmisanoCommunity Health and Social Services Center, Inc., Detroit, MI, USA.
Glory KoerbelUniversity of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Ann-Marie RoslandUniversity of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Health Services Center · USUniversity of Pittsburgh · USUniversity of Michigan–Ann Arbor · US

Funding

Research BaseP30DK092926 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI MARY ELLEN MICHELE HEISLER, ADESUWA B OLOMU · 2011 to 2026
$10.0M
Comparative Effectiveness of Adding Family Supporter Training and Engagement to a CHW-Led Intervention to Improve Behavioral Management of Multiple Risk Factors for Diabetes ComplicationsR01DK116733 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI ROSLAND, ANN-MARIE · 2018 to 2022
$2.8M
NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK092926NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK116733NIDDK NIH HHS R01DK116733
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDiabetes self-management education and support (DSMES) programs have struggled to deliver sustainable, effective support for adults with diabetes (AWDs) to improve self-management behaviors, achieve glycemic goals, and reduce risk for complications. One largely untapped resource for this support is AWDs' social networks. Fifty to 75% of AWDs have an unpaid family member or friend ("support person") who provides ongoing help with diabetes management. However, DSMES interventions to date lack structured and effective approaches to directly engage support persons in AWDs' diabetes management.

methodsThis parallel arm randomized trial is designed to determine the effectiveness of Family Support for Health Action (FAM-ACT), a novel community health worker (CHW)-delivered program focused on educating and supporting patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and their support persons (SPs), relative to an established, CHW-delivered, individual patient-focused DSMES and care management (I-DSMES) intervention. Both interventions were developed using a community-based participatory research (CBPR) approach. The study will be conducted in partnership with an urban Federally Qualified Health Center (FQHC) serving a low-income, Latino/a community, with target enrollment of 268 dyads consisting of an FQHC patient with T2D with high HbA1c and an SP. Patient-SP dyads will be randomized to receive FAM-ACT or I-DSMES over 6 months. The primary outcome is change in patient HbA1c from baseline to 6 months. Secondary patient outcomes include 12-month change in HbA1c, changes in patient blood pressure, diabetes self-management behaviors, diabetes distress, patient activation, diabetes self-efficacy, and perceptions of and satisfaction with SP support for diabetes. Secondary SP outcomes include self-efficacy for helping the patient with diabetes management and SP distress about the patient's diabetes. We also will assess the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on patient's ability to manage diabetes. DISCUSSION: This study will inform scalable, evidence-based approaches that leverage family support to help AWDs improve and sustain self-management strategies that underpin optimal management of multiple diabetes complication risk factors. The protocol is designed for and evaluated with a low-income and predominantly Latino/a community, which may increase applicability to other similar communities. The COVID-19 pandemic presented several challenges to study protocol and intervention delivery; modifications made to address these challenges are described.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT03812614. Registered on 18 January 2019.

Indexed as

COVID-19Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2AdultCommunity Health WorkersGlycated HemoglobinHumansPandemicsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicGlycated HemoglobinCommunity-based participatory researchCommunity health workersDyadic interventionFamily supportLatino/aPeer supportSelf-management interventionsSocial supportType 2 diabetes

Identifiers

PMID36192769
PMCPMC9527393
OpenAlexW4300962400

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.