Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36192730›Full record

SynthesisWorld journal of surgical oncology2022

Quality of life in patients with non-small cell lung cancer treated with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Wei Liu, Qian Zhang, Tiantian Zhang, Li Li, Chunhua Xu

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in World journal of surgical oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Use of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in non-small cell lung cancer in elderly patients: a meta-analysis and systematic review of randomized clinical trials.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Wei Liu *Department of Respiratory Medicine, Affiliated Nanjing Brain Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210029, Jiangsu, China.
Qian Zhang *Department of Respiratory Medicine, Affiliated Nanjing Brain Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210029, Jiangsu, China.
Tiantian ZhangDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Affiliated Nanjing Brain Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210029, Jiangsu, China.
Li LiDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Affiliated Nanjing Brain Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210029, Jiangsu, China.
Chunhua XuDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Affiliated Nanjing Brain Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210029, Jiangsu, China. xuch2188@163.com.
Nanjing Brain Hospital · CNNanjing Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundImmune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have dramatically prolonged survival in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients, but little research had focused on its impact on quality of life (QoL). The purpose of our study was to compare the QoL in patients with NSCLC treated with programmed cell death protein-1/programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-1/PD-L1) inhibitors versus chemotherapy.

methodsWe searched for randomized controlled trials utilizing the Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 items (QLQ-C30) and the EuroQol Five Dimensions Questionnaire-3L (EQ-5D-3L) to assess the QoL of NSCLC treated with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors versus chemotherapy. We collected hazard ratios (HRs) for the time from baseline to the first clinically significant deterioration (TTD) and effect size as the difference in mean change between and within treatment groups in patients' reported outcomes (PROs). (PROSPERO registration number: CRD42022296680).

resultsIn the five trials reported by QLQ-C30, TTD was longer in PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors compared with control groups (HR = 0.86; 95% CI = 0.76, 0.97; P = 0.013), with similar results in terms of physical function, role function, and pain. The difference in mean change between the PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors group and the chemotherapy group in QLQ-C30 and EQ-5D VAS was 3.64 (95% CI = 1.62, 5.66; P = 0.001) and 4.74 (95% CI = 2.65, 6.83; P = 0.001), which supported PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors. However, for the EQ-5D utility index, there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups, with a mean change difference of 0.03 (95% CI = -0.01, 0.07; P = 0.094). The mean change from baseline to follow-up in PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors group was 2.57 (95% CI = 0.43, 4.71; P = 0.019), and chemotherapy group was -1.31 (95% CI = -3.71, 1.09; P = 0.284), correspondingly. The subgroup analysis showed that no difference was observed between open-label and double-blind trials in patients treated with chemotherapy or PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors.

conclusionIn conclusion, PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors could improve the QoL of patients with NSCLC compared to chemotherapy and reduce unfavorable symptoms during treatment.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungLung NeoplasmsApoptosis Regulatory ProteinsB7-H1 AntigenHumansImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsLigandsProgrammed Cell Death 1 ReceptorQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicApoptosis Regulatory ProteinsB7-H1 AntigenImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsLigandsProgrammed Cell Death 1 ReceptorChemotherapyMeta-analysisNon-small cell lung cancerPD-1/PD-L1 inhibitorsQuality of life

Identifiers

PMID36192730
PMCPMC9531439
OpenAlexW4300717063

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.