ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2022
Facilitation of dependent transfers with functional neuromuscular stimulation: a computer simulation study.
Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Feasibility of optimizing muscle activation of individuals with spinal cord injuries to reduce caregiver effort in assisted transfers.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
A two-part simulation process was developed to investigate the facilitation of vertical patient lifts with functional neuromuscular stimulation (FNS) in individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI). First, external lifting forces representing caregiver assistance were applied to a 3D musculoskeletal model representing the patient and optimized to enforce a specific lifting trajectory during a forward dynamic simulation. The process was repeated with and without the activation of the knee, hip, and trunk extensor muscles of the patient model to represent contractions of the paralyzed muscles generated via FNS. Secondly, the spinal compression experienced by a caregiver at the L5/S1 joint while generating these external lifting forces was estimated using a second musculoskeletal model representing the caregiver. Simulation without muscle activation predicted spinal compression in the caregiver model approximately 1.3 × the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) recommended "Action Limit." Comparatively, simulations with two unique patterns of muscle activation both predicted caregiver spinal compressions below NIOSH recommendations. These simulation results support the hypothesis that FNS activation of a patient's otherwise paralyzed muscles would lower the force output required of a caregiver during a dependent transfer, thus lowering the spinal compression and risk of injury experienced by a caregiver.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.