Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36192515›Full record

ReviewAnnals of surgical oncology2023

The Landmark Series-Addressing Disparities in Breast Cancer Screening: New Recommendations for Black Women.

Oluwadamilola M Fayanju, Christine E Edmonds, Sylvia A Reyes, Cletus Arciero, Vivian J Bea, Angelena Crown, Kathie-Ann Joseph

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of surgical oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Oluwadamilola M Fayanju *Department of Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine, The University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Christine E Edmonds *Rena Rowan Breast Center, Abramson Cancer Center, The University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Sylvia A ReyesDepartment of Surgery, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine, Hofstra/Northwell, New Hyde Park, NY, USA.
Cletus ArcieroDivision of Surgical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Vivian J BeaDepartment of Surgery, New York-Presbyterian, Brooklyn Methodist, Brooklyn, NY, USA.
Angelena CrownBreast Surgery, True Family Women's Cancer Center, Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA, USA.
Kathie-Ann JosephDepartment of Surgery, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA. Kathie-Ann.Joseph@nyulangone.org.
Donald & Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell · USEmory University · USNewYork–Presbyterian Brooklyn Methodist Hospital · USNew York University · USSwedish Medical Center · USUniversidad de León · ESUniversity of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

Using Modifiable Risk Factors to Predict Inferior Care and Survival after Breast Cancer Diagnosis: A Novel Approach to Addressing Health DisparitiesK08CA241390 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI FAYANJU, OLUWADAMILOLA M. · 2019 to 2023
$1.1M
NCI NIH HHS K08 CA241390
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Randomized, clinical trials have established the efficacy of screening mammography in improving survival from breast cancer for women through detection of early, asymptomatic disease. However, disparities in survival rates between black women and women from other racial and ethnic groups following breast cancer diagnosis persist. Various professional groups have different, somewhat conflicting, guidelines with regards to recommended age for commencing screening as well as recommended frequency of screening exams, but the trials upon which these recommendations are based were not specifically designed to examine benefit among black women. Furthermore, these recommendations do not appear to incorporate the unique epidemiological circumstances of breast cancer among black women, including higher rates of diagnosis before age 40 years and greater likelihood of advanced stage at diagnosis, into their formulation. In this review, we examined the epidemiologic and socioeconomic factors that are associated with breast cancer among black women and assess the implications of these factors for screening in this population. Specifically, we recommend that by no later than age 25 years, all black women should undergo baseline assessment for future risk of breast cancer utilizing a model that incorporates race (e.g., Breast Cancer Risk Assessment Tool [BCRAT], formerly the Gail model) and that this assessment should be conducted by a breast specialist or a healthcare provider (e.g., primary care physician or gynecologist) who is trained to assess breast cancer risk and is aware of the increased risks of early (i.e., premenopausal) and biologically aggressive (e.g., late-stage, triple-negative) breast cancer among black women.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerAdultFemaleHumansMammographySocioeconomic Factors

Identifiers

PMID36192515
PMCPMC9742297
OpenAlexW4300817269

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.