ArticleScientific reports2022
Efficacy of thermoplastic polyurethane and gelatin blended nanofibers covered stent graft in the porcine iliac artery.
Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Topology-Driven Mechanical Tuning of FDM-Printed TPU Tubular Lattices with Auxetic Architectures.Micromachines · 2026Article
- Mechanically Robust Biodegradable Stents With Theragenerative Vascular Responses via Combined 3D Printing and Janus Nanoengineering.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Fabrication of a low-kink-radius bilayer vascular scaffold incorporating a TPU stent fabricated via melt electrowriting and an electrospun PCL/PU/gelatin layer.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Efficacy of closed cell self expandable metallic stent for peripheral arterial disease in the porcine iliac artery.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Effect of Sterilization Methods on Electrospun Scaffolds Produced from Blend of Polyurethane with Gelatin.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Stent-grafts composed of expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (e-PTFE), polyethylene terephthalate (PET) and polyurethane (PU) are characterized by poor endothelialization, high modulus, and low compliance, leading to thrombosis and intimal hyperplasia. A composite synthetic/natural matrix is considered a promising alternative to conventional synthetic stent-grafts. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU) and gelatin (GL) blended nanofibers (NFs) covered stent-graft in the porcine iliac artery. Twelve pigs were randomly sacrificed 7 days (n = 6) and 28 days (n = 6) after stent-graft placement. The thrombogenicity score at 28 days was significantly increased compared at 7 days (p < 0.001). The thickness of neointimal hyperplasia, degree of inflammatory cell infiltration, and degree of collagen deposition were significantly higher at 28 days than at 7 days (all p < 0.001). The TPU and GL blended NFs-covered stent-grafts successfully maintained the patency for 28 days in the porcine iliac artery. Although thrombosis with neointimal tissue were observed, no subsequent occlusion of the stent-graft was noted until the end of the study. Composite synthetic/natural matrix-covered stent-grafts may be promising for prolonging stent-graft patency.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.