ArticleOncogene2022
CaSee: A lightning transfer-learning model directly used to discriminate cancer/normal cells from scRNA-seq.
Article in Oncogene, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- CanCellCap: robust cancer cell capture across tissue types on single-cell RNA-seq data by multi-domain learning.BMC biology · 2025Article
- Pan-cancer analysis shapes the understanding of cancer biology and medicine.Cancer communications (London, England) · 2025Review
- Out of distribution learning in bioinformatics: advancements and challenges.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Review
- Domain generalization enables general cancer cell annotation in single-cell and spatial transcriptomics.Nature communications · 2024Article
- A review of computational methods for predicting cancer drug response at the single-cell level through integration with bulk RNAseq data.Current opinion in structural biology · 2024Review
- Active regression model for clinical grading of COVID-19.Frontiers in immunology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) is one of the most efficient technologies for human tumor research. However, data analysis is still faced with technical challenges, especially the difficulty in efficiently and accurately discriminating cancer/normal cells in the scRNA-seq expression matrix. If we can address these challenges, we can have a deeper understanding of the intratumoral and intertumoral heterogeneity. In this study, we developed a cancer/normal cell discrimination pipeline called pan-Cancer Seeker (CaSee) devoted to scRNA-seq expression matrix, which is based on the traditional high-quality pan-cancer bulk sequencing data using transfer learning. CaSee is the first tool directly used to discriminate cancer/normal cells in the scRNA-seq expression matrix, with much wider application fields and higher efficiency than copy number variation (CNV) method which requires corresponding reference cells. CaSee is user-friendly and can adapt to a variety of data sources, including but not limited to scRNA tissue sequencing data, scRNA cell line sequencing data, scRNA xenograft cell sequencing data and scRNA circulating tumor cell sequencing data. It is compatible with mainstream sequencing technology platforms, 10× Genomics Chromium, Smart-seq2, and Microwell-seq. Here, CaSee pipeline exhibited excellent performance in the multicenter data evaluation of 11 retrospective cohorts and one independent dataset, with an average discrimination accuracy of 96.69%. In general, the development of a deep-learning based, pan-cancer cell discrimination model, CaSee, to distinguish cancer cells from normal cells will be compelling to researchers working in the genomics, cancer, and single-cell fields.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.