Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36192479›Full record

ArticleOncogene2022

CaSee: A lightning transfer-learning model directly used to discriminate cancer/normal cells from scRNA-seq.

Yuan Sh, Xiuli Zhang, Zhimin Yang, Jierong Dong, Yuanzhuo Wang, Ying Zhou, Xuejie Li, Caixia Guo, Zhiyuan Hu

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Oncogene, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Yuan Sh *Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Brain Aging and Neurodegenerative Diseases, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, 350108, Fujian Province, China. yuansh3354@163.com.ORCID 0000-0002-6028-0185
Xiuli Zhang *CAS Key Laboratory for Biomedical Effects of Nanomaterials and Nanosafety, CAS Key Laboratory of Standardization and Measurement for Nanotechnology, CAS Center for Excellence in Nanoscience, National Center for Nanoscience and Technology of China, Beijing, 100190, China. zhangxl2020@nanoctr.cn.ORCID 0000-0002-5694-0101
Zhimin Yang *Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Brain Aging and Neurodegenerative Diseases, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, 350108, Fujian Province, China.
Jierong DongCAS Key Laboratory for Biomedical Effects of Nanomaterials and Nanosafety, CAS Key Laboratory of Standardization and Measurement for Nanotechnology, CAS Center for Excellence in Nanoscience, National Center for Nanoscience and Technology of China, Beijing, 100190, China.
Yuanzhuo WangCAS Key Laboratory for Biomedical Effects of Nanomaterials and Nanosafety, CAS Key Laboratory of Standardization and Measurement for Nanotechnology, CAS Center for Excellence in Nanoscience, National Center for Nanoscience and Technology of China, Beijing, 100190, China.
Ying ZhouFujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Brain Aging and Neurodegenerative Diseases, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, 350108, Fujian Province, China.
Xuejie LiFujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Brain Aging and Neurodegenerative Diseases, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, 350108, Fujian Province, China.
Caixia GuoChina National Center for Bioinformation, Beijing, China.
Zhiyuan HuFujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Brain Aging and Neurodegenerative Diseases, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, 350108, Fujian Province, China. huzy@nanoctr.cn.ORCID 0000-0003-2212-0268
Fujian Medical University · CNNational Center for Nanoscience and Technology · CNChinese Academy of Sciences · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) is one of the most efficient technologies for human tumor research. However, data analysis is still faced with technical challenges, especially the difficulty in efficiently and accurately discriminating cancer/normal cells in the scRNA-seq expression matrix. If we can address these challenges, we can have a deeper understanding of the intratumoral and intertumoral heterogeneity. In this study, we developed a cancer/normal cell discrimination pipeline called pan-Cancer Seeker (CaSee) devoted to scRNA-seq expression matrix, which is based on the traditional high-quality pan-cancer bulk sequencing data using transfer learning. CaSee is the first tool directly used to discriminate cancer/normal cells in the scRNA-seq expression matrix, with much wider application fields and higher efficiency than copy number variation (CNV) method which requires corresponding reference cells. CaSee is user-friendly and can adapt to a variety of data sources, including but not limited to scRNA tissue sequencing data, scRNA cell line sequencing data, scRNA xenograft cell sequencing data and scRNA circulating tumor cell sequencing data. It is compatible with mainstream sequencing technology platforms, 10× Genomics Chromium, Smart-seq2, and Microwell-seq. Here, CaSee pipeline exhibited excellent performance in the multicenter data evaluation of 11 retrospective cohorts and one independent dataset, with an average discrimination accuracy of 96.69%. In general, the development of a deep-learning based, pan-cancer cell discrimination model, CaSee, to distinguish cancer cells from normal cells will be compelling to researchers working in the genomics, cancer, and single-cell fields.

Indexed as

LightningNeoplasmsDNA Copy Number VariationsGene Expression ProfilingHumansRetrospective StudiesSequence Analysis, RNASingle-Cell AnalysisSoftware

Identifiers

PMID36192479
OpenAlexW4300773045

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.