ArticleScientific reports2022
Ultrasound-assessed diaphragm dysfunction predicts clinical outcomes in hemodialysis patients.
Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Muscle ultrasound to diagnose sarcopenia in chronic kidney disease: a systematic review and bayesian bivariate meta-analysis.BMC nephrology · 2024Pooled it
- The gut microbiome, chronic kidney disease, and sarcopenia.Cell communication and signaling : CCS · 2024Review
- Diaphragm Ultrasound in Different Clinical Scenarios: A Review with a Focus on Older Patients.Geriatrics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Skeletal muscle atrophy is prevalent and remarkably increases the risk of cardiovascular (CV) events and mortality in hemodialysis (HD) patients. However, whether diaphragm dysfunction predicts clinical outcomes in HD patients is unknown. This was a prospective cohort study of 103 HD patients. After assessment of diaphragm function by ultrasonography and collection of other baseline data, a 36-month follow-up was then initiated. Participants were divided into diaphragm dysfunction (DD+) group and normal diaphragm function (DD-) group, according to cutoff value of thickening ratio (i.e. the change ratio of diaphragm thickness) at force respiration. The primary endpoint was the first nonfatal CV event or all-cause mortality. A secondary endpoint was less serious CV events (LSCEs, a composite of heart failure readmission, cardiac arrhythmia or myocardial ischemia needed pharmacological intervention in hospital). 98 patients were eligible to analysis and 57 (58.16%) were men. 28 of 44 patients(63.64%) in DD+ group and 23 of 54 patients (42.59%) in DD- group had at least one nonfatal CV event or death (p = 0.038). Compared to DD- group, DD+ group had significantly higher incidence of LSCEs (21 vs.14, p = 0.025) and shorter survival time (22.02 ± 12.98 months vs. 26.74 ± 12.59 months, p = 0.046). Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed significantly higher risks of primary endpoint (p = 0.039), and LSCEs (p = 0.040) in DD+ group. Multivariate hazard analysis showed that DD+ group had significantly higher risk of primary endpoint [hazard ratio (HR) 1.59; 95% confident interval (CI) 1.54-1.63], and LSCEs (HR 1.47; 95%CI 1.40-1.55). Ultrasound-assessed diaphragm dysfunction predicts clinical outcomes in HD patients.Trial registration: This study was registered with Chinese Clinical Trials Registry ( www.chictr.org.cn ) as ChiCTR1800016500 on Jun 05, 2018.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.