Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36192101›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2022

P(v-a)CO

Wan-Jie Gu, Yu-Jia Kong, Yun-Jie Li, Chun-Mei Wang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 81% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Wan-Jie GuDepartment of Intensive Care Unit, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China.
Yu-Jia KongSchool of Public Health, Weifang Medical University, Weifang, Shandong Province, China.
Yun-Jie LiDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of Weifang Medical University, Weifang, Shandong Province, China.
Chun-Mei WangDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of Weifang Medical University, Weifang, Shandong Province, China lengmei.1218@163.com.ORCID 0000-0002-6453-6731
Weifang Medical University · CNFirst Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionRed blood cell (RBC) transfusion primarily aims to improve oxygen transport and tissue oxygenation. The transfusion strategy based on haemoglobin concentration could not accurately reflect cellular metabolism. The ratio of venous-arterial carbon dioxide tension difference to arterial-venous oxygen content difference (P(v-a)CO METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The study is a single-centre prospective cohort study. We consecutively enrol adult septic shock patients requiring RBC transfusion at intensive care unit (ICU) admission or during ICU stay. P(v-a)CO ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study has been approved by the Institutional Review Board of Affiliated Hospital of Weifang Medical University (wyfy-2021-ky-059). Findings will be disseminated through conference presentations and peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ChiCTR2100051748.

Indexed as

AnemiaSepsisShock, SepticAdultCarbon DioxideErythrocyte TransfusionHemoglobinsHumansOxygenPrognosisProspective StudiesCarbon DioxideHemoglobinsOxygenAdult intensive & critical careAnaemiaBlood bank & transfusion medicine

Identifiers

PMID36192101
PMCPMC9535211
OpenAlexW4300865628

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.