Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36192093›Full record

ReviewBMJ open2022

The need for a complex systems approach in rural health research.

Adam Hulme, Jason Thompson, Andrew Brown, Geoff Argus

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Systems Science in Nutrition and Dietetics Research: A Practical Lens for Applying Systems Approaches in Research.Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association · 2026
    Review
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. From Deficit to Strength-Based Aboriginal Health Research-Moving toward Flourishing.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Adam HulmeSouthern Queensland Rural Health (SQRH), Faculty of Health and Behavioural Sciences, The University of Queensland, Toowoomba, Queensland, Australia a.hulme@uq.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0002-3305-8538
Jason ThompsonUniversity Department of Rural Health, Faculty of Dentistry, Medicine and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Andrew BrownInstitute for Health Transformation, Global Centre for Preventive Health and Nutrition, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.
Geoff ArgusSouthern Queensland Rural Health (SQRH), Faculty of Health and Behavioural Sciences, The University of Queensland, Toowoomba, Queensland, Australia.
The University of Queensland · AUDeakin University · AUThe University of Melbourne · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

On a global scale, many major rural health issues have persisted for decades despite the introduction of new health interventions and public health policies. Although research efforts have generated valuable new knowledge about the aetiology of health, disease and health inequities in rural communities, rural health systems remain to be some of the most deprived and challenged in both the developing and developed world. While the reasons for this are many, a significant factor contributing to the current state of play is the pressing need for methodological innovation and relevant scientific approaches that have the capacity to support the translation of novel solutions into 'real world' rural contexts. Fortunately, complex systems approaches, which have seen an increase in popularity in the wider public health literature, could provide answers to some of the most resilient rural health problems in recent times. The purpose of this article is to promote the value and utility of a complex systems approach in rural health research. We explain the benefits of a complex systems approach and provide a background to the complexity sciences, including the main characteristics of complex systems. Two popular computational methods are described. The next step for rural health research involves exploring how a complex systems approach can help with the identification and evaluation of new and existing solutions to policy-resistant rural health issues. This includes generating awareness around the analytical trade-offs that occur between the use of traditional scientific methods and complex systems approaches.

Indexed as

Rural HealthRural PopulationHumansSystems AnalysisHEALTH SERVICES ADMINISTRATION & MANAGEMENTPUBLIC HEALTHSTATISTICS & RESEARCH METHODS

Identifiers

PMID36192093
PMCPMC9535183
OpenAlexW4300863203

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.