Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36192090›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2022

International patient preferences for physician attire: results from cross-sectional studies in four countries across three continents.

Nathan Houchens, Sanjay Saint, Christopher Petrilli, Latoya Kuhn, David Ratz, Lindsey De Lott, Marc Zollinger, Hugo Sax, Kazuhiro Kamata, Akira Kuriyama and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Beyond appearance: patient perspectives on the role of physician attire in trust.Journal of medical ethics and history of medicine · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Public Perceptions of Surgeon Attire in Saudi Arabia.Patient preference and adherence · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 12 institutions in 7 countries.

Nathan HouchensMedicine Service, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA nathanho@med.umich.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-3923-0711
Sanjay SaintMedicine Service, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Christopher PetrilliDepartment of Medicine, NYU Langone Health, New York, New York, USA.
Latoya KuhnMedicine Service, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
David RatzMedicine Service, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Lindsey De LottW K Kellogg Eye Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Marc ZollingerPsychiatric University Hospital Zurich Department of Social and General Psychiatry Zurich West, Zurich, Switzerland.
Hugo SaxDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Inselspital University Hospital Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Kazuhiro KamataDepartment of Pediatrics, Niigata University Faculty of Medicine Graduate School of Medical and Dental Science, Niigata, Japan.
Akira KuriyamaEmergency and Critical Care Center, Kurashiki Central Hospital, Okayama, Japan.
Yasuharu TokudaDepartment of Medicine, Muribushi Project for Okinawa Residency Programs, Okinawa, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-9325-7934
Carlo FumagalliDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7963-5049
Gianni VirgiliDepartment of Neurosciences, Psychology, Drug Research and Child Health (NEUROFARBA), University of Florence, Florence, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9960-2989
Stefano FumagalliDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Vineet ChopraDepartment of Medicine, University of Colorado, Denver, Colorado, USA.
University of Michigan · USUniversity of Florence · ITFukushima Medical University · JPKurashiki Central Hospital · JPNYU Langone Health · USOkinawa Prefecture · JPQueen's University Belfast · GBUniversity Hospital of Bern · CHUniversity Hospital of Zurich · CHUniversity of Colorado System · USVA Ann Arbor Healthcare System · USW.K. Kellogg Foundation · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe patient-physician relationship impacts patients' experiences and health outcomes. Physician attire is a form of nonverbal communication that influences this relationship. Prior studies examining attire preferences suffered from heterogeneous measurement and limited context. We thus performed a multicentre, cross-sectional study using a standardised survey instrument to compare patient preferences for physician dress in international settings.

setting20 hospitals and healthcare practices in Italy, Japan, Switzerland and the USA.

participantsConvenience sample of 9171 adult patients receiving care in academic hospitals, general medicine clinics, specialty clinics and ophthalmology practices. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The survey was randomised and included photographs of a male or female physician dressed in assorted forms of attire. The primary outcome measure was attire preference, comprised of composite ratings across five domains: how knowledgeable, trustworthy, caring and approachable the physician appeared, and how comfortable the respondent felt. Secondary outcome measures included variation in preferences by country, physician type and respondent characteristics.

resultsThe highest rated forms of attire differed by country, although each most preferred attire with white coat. Low ratings were conferred on attire extremes (casual and business suit). Preferences were more uniform for certain physician types. For example, among all respondents, scrubs garnered the highest rating for emergency department physicians (44.2%) and surgeons (42.4%). However, attire preferences diverged for primary care and hospital physicians. All types of formal attire were more strongly preferred in the USA than elsewhere. Respondent age influenced preferences in Japan and the USA only.

conclusionsPatients across a myriad of geographies, settings and demographics harbour specific preferences for physician attire. Some preferences are nearly universal, whereas others vary substantially. As a one-size-fits-all dress policy is unlikely to reflect patient desires and expectations, a tailored approach should be sought that attempts to match attire to clinical context.

Indexed as

Patient PreferencePhysiciansAdultClothingCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMalePhysician-Patient RelationsSurveys and QuestionnairesclothingdressGENERAL MEDICINE (see Internal Medicine)Health policynonverbal communicationpatient-physician relationshippatient preferencesPhysician attireProtocols & guidelinesuniform

Identifiers

PMID36192090
PMCPMC9535197
OpenAlexW4300864206

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.