ArticleRespiratory care2023
A Quality Improvement Initiative to Reduce Unneeded Screening Chest Radiographs in a Pediatric Cardiovascular ICU.
Article in Respiratory care, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Frequency, cost, and variation in inpatient diagnostic imaging use in children's hospitals.Journal of hospital medicine · 2026Article
- Examining the Use of Chest Radiographs in Complicated Pneumonia Requiring Thoracotomy.Hospital pediatrics · 2025Article
- A Quality Improvement Initiative to Reduce Unnecessary Screening Chest Radiographs in a Pediatric ICU.Respiratory care · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAdult critical care and radiographical societies have recommended changing practice from routine screening radiographs to on-demand chest radiographs (CXRs) for stable mechanically ventilated adult patients. There are no similar recommendations for patients in the pediatric ICU. Reducing the frequency with which unneeded CXRs are obtained can decrease radiation exposure and reduce waste, a substantial contributor to rising health care costs. We aimed to reduce unneeded daily screening CXRs in a pediatric cardiovascular ICU (CICU) by 20% in 6 months.
methodsCriteria delineating which subjects in the CICU required daily screening CXRs were created and added to the daily rounding sheet for discussion for each subject. The primary goal of this study was to reduce CXRs in mechanically ventilated subjects as our previous practice had been to order daily CXRs. Respiratory therapists increased the frequency of evaluating and documenting endotracheal tube positioning prior to the initiation of this project. The outcome measure was the percentage subjects who received a daily screening CXR. The ratio of daily screening CXRs to the number of total CXRs ordered and unplanned extubations were followed as balancing measures.
resultsThe number of subjects who received a daily screening CXR decreased from a baseline of 67% to 44% over the course of this project. There was no change in the ratio of daily screening CXRs to the number of total CXRs ordered or an increase in unplanned extubations. With an estimated cost of $268 per CXR, a reduction of 33% in routine screening CXRs saves an estimated $250,000 annually.
conclusionsA decrease in daily screening CXRs can be sustained through the development of specific criteria to determine which patients need screening radiographs. This can be achieved without an increase in CXRs obtained at other times throughout the day or an increase in unplanned extubations. This eliminates unneeded health care expenditures, improves resource allocation for radiology technicians, and decreases disruptive interventions for patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.