ArticleHuman movement science2022
Rey-Osterrieth complex figure recall scores and motor skill learning in older adults: A non-linear mixed effect model-based analysis.
Article in Human movement science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evaluation of cognitive impairments in multiple sclerosis: a comparative analysis of the Rey complex figure test and the symbol digit modalities test.Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria · 2026Article
- Standardizing the Measurement and Definition of Post-Stroke Cognitive Impairment: Implications for Stroke Recovery and Rehabilitation.Neurorehabilitation and neural repair · 2026Review
- Effects of visual terminal feedback on hand dexterity in relation to visuospatial ability in subacute stroke: a preliminary study.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Twenty minutes of Corsi block tapping task training does not improve mental rotation in adults with stroke.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
- Examining the Diagnostic Accuracy of a Novel Performance-Based Test for Alzheimer's Disease Screening.The journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Age-related declines in motor learning are well documented. Visuospatial memory has been proposed as a key factor explaining age-related declines in sensorimotor adaptation, but most studies have not used standardized visuospatial memory tests nor controlled for age-related visuospatial memory declines. The present study explores the relationship between visuospatial memory and motor learning in older adults while also controlling for age and utilizing a standardized visuospatial memory test. Forty-nine nondemented older adults repetitively practiced a functional upper-extremity motor task and were re-assessed one week later. Training data were modeled with mixed-effect exponential decay functions, with parameters representing amount of performance change, rate of improvement, and final performance. Age and visuospatial memory were included as possible covariates for the parameter measuring rate of improvement (τ). After controlling for age, higher visuospatial memory scores were associated with faster rates of skill acquisition and better short-term retention one week later. These associations with visuospatial memory were dependent, however, on the level of initial skill. These findings suggest that the extent of re-learning motor skills in geriatric physical rehabilitation may depend on intact visuospatial memory.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.