ArticleOncology2023
The Prognostic Utilities of DNA Mismatch Repair Status and KRAS and BRAF Mutation in Korean Colorectal Cancer Patients: The KASID Multicenter Study.
Article in Oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Interval Colorectal Cancers in a Fecal Immunochemical Test-Based Screening Program.JAMA network open · 2025Article
- Development and validation of a clinical prognostic model for BRAF V600E-mutated colorectal cancer patients based on pathological stage, microsatellite status, and primary tumor site.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionKRAS, BRAF, and DNA mismatch repair (MMR) mutations aid clinical decision-making for colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. To ensure accurate predictions, the prognostic utilities of these biomarkers and their combinations must be individualized for patients with various TNM stages.
methodsHere, we retrospectively analyzed the clinicopathological features of 904 Korean CRC patients who underwent CRC surgery in three teaching hospitals from 2011 to 2013; we also assessed the prognostic utilities of KRAS, BRAF, and MMR mutations in these patients.
resultsThe overall frequencies of KRAS and BRAF mutations were 35.8% and 3.2%, respectively. Sixty-nine patients (7.6%) lacking expression of ≥1 MMR protein were considered MMR protein deficient (MMR-D); the remaining patients were considered MMR protein intact. KRAS mutations constituted an independent risk factor for shorter overall survival (OS) in TNM stage I-IV and stage III patients. BRAF mutations were associated with shorter OS in TNM stage I-IV patients. MMR-D status was strongly positive prognostic in TNM stage I-II patients. DISCUSSION/
conclusionTo our knowledge, this is the first multicenter study to explore the prognostic utilities of KRAS, BRAF, and MMR statuses in Korean CRC patients. Various combinations of KRAS, BRAF, and DNA MMR mutations serve as genetic signatures that affect tumor behavior; they are prognostic in CRC patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.