Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36191379›Full record

ArticleBody image2022

Development and validation of a measure of curvy ideals internalization.

D Catherine Walker, Sarah E Gaither, Bonelyn De Los Santos, Jessica Keigan, Lauren M Schaefer, J Kevin Thompson

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Body image, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

D Catherine WalkerUnion College, Psychology Department, 807 Union St., Schenectady, NY 12308, USA.
Sarah E GaitherDuke University, Psychology Department, 417 Chapel Drive, 324 Reuben-Cooke Building, Durham, NC 27708, USA.
Bonelyn De Los SantosUnion College, Psychology Department, 807 Union St., Schenectady, NY 12308, USA.
Jessica KeiganUnion College, Psychology Department, 807 Union St., Schenectady, NY 12308, USA.
Lauren M SchaeferSanford Center for Bio-behavioral Research, 120 8th St S, Fargo, ND 58103, USA; University of North Dakota School of Medicine and Health Sciences, 1919 Elm St N, Fargo, ND 58102, USA.
J Kevin ThompsonDepartment of Psychology, University of South Florida, 4202 E. Fowler Ave., Tampa, FL 33620, USA.
Union College · USDuke University · USUniversity of North Dakota · USUniversity of South Florida · US

Funding

The Neurocognitive Reward Learning Mechanisms of Binge EatingP20GM134969 · NIGMS · SANFORD RESEARCH NORTH · PI DODD, DORIAN R · 2021 to 2025
$11.5M
NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM134969
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Several sociocultural female body ideals exist - thin, muscular/athletic, and, more recently, curvier ideals, which research specifically suggests are more prevalent among Black women. Two validated measures assess women's desire for curvier bodies, but neither assess certain facets of curvy ideals (e.g., thick vs. slim-thick) separately. We developed and validated the Curvy Ideals Internalization (CII) Scale, to be used alone or alongside existing measures of appearance ideal internalization. Focus groups among racially/ethnically diverse women informed initial items. A sample of 897 White (37.1%), Black (34.2%), and biracial Black and White (28.7%) U.S. women completed the initial 37-item CII to determine factor structure, narrow the item pool, and examine validity and reliability. A separate sample (N = 366) of U.S. Black, White, and biracial women completed the CII to confirm the factor structure. The final CII has eleven items, with factors assessing thick/curvy ideal internalization and facets of slim-thick ideal internalization: thin waist and large breast size. The CII has adequate internal consistency, test-retest reliability, construct validity, and factorial validity. The CII is appropriate for use among Black, White, and biracial women to assess internalization of curvier body ideals and needs to be validated in more diverse samples.

Indexed as

Body ImageDefense MechanismsBlack PeopleFemaleHumansPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesBody ideal internalizationHourglassPsychometricsSlim-thickThick/curvy body idealValidation

Identifiers

PMID36191379
PMCPMC9750804
OpenAlexW4298113337

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.