Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36191056›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2022

Modulation of working memory duration by synaptic and astrocytic mechanisms.

Sophia Becker, Andreas Nold, Tatjana Tchumatchenko

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Ventral striatal astrocytes contribute to reinforcement learning.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Building transformers from neurons and astrocytes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Get Stoke(s)d! Introduction to the Special Focus.Journal of cognitive neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  10. Multiple forms of working memory emerge from synapse-astrocyte interactions in a neuron-glia network model.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sophia BeckerLaboratory of Computational Neuroscience, Brain Mind Institute, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-9574-0727
Andreas NoldTheory of Neural Dynamics group, Max Planck Institute for Brain Research, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7890-0266
Tatjana TchumatchenkoTheory of Neural Dynamics group, Max Planck Institute for Brain Research, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9137-809X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Short-term synaptic plasticity and modulations of the presynaptic vesicle release rate are key components of many working memory models. At the same time, an increasing number of studies suggests a potential role of astrocytes in modulating higher cognitive function such as WM through their influence on synaptic transmission. Which influence astrocytic signaling could have on the stability and duration of WM representations, however, is still unclear. Here, we introduce a slow, activity-dependent astrocytic regulation of the presynaptic release probability in a synaptic attractor model of WM. We compare and analyze simulations of a simple WM protocol in firing rate and spiking networks with and without astrocytic regulation, and underpin our observations with analyses of the phase space dynamics in the rate network. We find that the duration and stability of working memory representations are altered by astrocytic signaling and by noise. We show that astrocytic signaling modulates the mean duration of WM representations. Moreover, if the astrocytic regulation is strong, a slow presynaptic timescale introduces a 'window of vulnerability', during which WM representations are easily disruptable by noise before being stabilized. We identify two mechanisms through which noise from different sources in the network can either stabilize or destabilize WM representations. Our findings suggest that (i) astrocytic regulation can act as a crucial determinant for the duration of WM representations in synaptic attractor models of WM, and (ii) that astrocytic signaling could facilitate different mechanisms for volitional top-down control of WM representations and their duration.

Indexed as

AstrocytesMemory, Short-TermModels, NeurologicalNeuronal PlasticitySynaptic Transmission

Identifiers

PMID36191056
PMCPMC9560596

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.