Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36191019›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Disinfection of otorhinolaryngological endoscopes with electrolyzed acid water: A cross-sectional and multicenter study.

Takayuki Okano, Tatsunori Sakamoto, Seiji Ishikawa, Susumu Sakamoto, Masanobu Mizuta, Yuji Kitada, Keisuke Mizuno, Hideki Hayashi, Youichi Suzuki, Takashi Nakano and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Takayuki OkanoDepartment of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-2049-9673
Tatsunori SakamotoDepartment of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Shimane University, Matsue, Shimane, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-6669-7013
Seiji IshikawaIshikawa Clinic, Kyoto, Japan.
Susumu SakamotoDepartment of Otolaryngology, Min-iren Chuo Hospital, Kyoto, Japan.
Masanobu MizutaDepartment of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Yuji KitadaDepartment of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Keisuke MizunoDepartment of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Hideki HayashiProduct Planning Department, Kaigen Pharma Co., Ltd., Osaka, Japan.
Youichi SuzukiDepartment of Microbiology and Infection Control, Faculty of Medicine, Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Takatsuki, Osaka, Japan.
Takashi NakanoProject Team for Medical Application of Electrolysis, Central Research Center, Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Takatsuki, Osaka, Japan.
Koichi OmoriDepartment of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-3404-5461
Kyoto University · JPOsaka University of Pharmaceutical Sciences · JPShimane University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Glutaraldehyde, a germicide for reprocessing endoscopes that is important for hygiene in the clinic, might be hazardous to humans. Electrolyzed acid water (EAW) has a broad anti-microbial spectrum and safety profile and might be a glutaraldehyde alternative. We sought to assess EAW disinfection of flexible endoscopes in clinical otorhinolaryngological settings and its in vitro inactivation of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and bacteria commonly isolated in otorhinolaryngology. Ninety endoscopes were tested for bacterial contamination before and after endoscope disinfection with EAW. The species and strains of bacteria were studied. The in vitro inactivation of bacteria and SARS-CoV-2 by EAW was investigated to determine the efficacy of endoscope disinfection. More than 20 colony-forming units of bacteria at one or more sampling sites were detected in 75/90 microbiological cultures of samples from clinically used endoscopes (83.3%). The most common genus detected was Staphylococcus followed by Cutibacterium and Corynebacterium at all sites including the ears, noses, and throats. In the in vitro study, more than 107 CFU/mL of all bacterial species examined were reduced to below the detection limit (<10 CFU/mL) within 30 s after contact with EAW. When SARS-CoV-2 was treated with a 99-fold volume of EAW, the initial viral titer (> 105 PFU) was decreased to less than 5 PFU. Effective inactivation of SARS-CoV-2 was also observed with a 19:1 ratio of EAW to the virus. EAW effectively reprocessed flexible endoscopes contributing to infection control in medical institutions in the era of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic.

Indexed as

COVID-19DisinfectionBacteriaCross-Sectional StudiesEndoscopesEndoscopes, GastrointestinalEquipment ContaminationGlutaralHumansSARS-CoV-2WaterGlutaralWater

Identifiers

PMID36191019
PMCPMC9529105
OpenAlexW4300688452

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.