Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36190969›Full record

Observational studyPloS one2022

Identification of families in need of support: Correlates of adverse childhood experiences in the right@home sustained nurse home visiting program.

Lynn Kemp, Tracey Bruce, Emma L Elcombe, Fiona Byrne, Sheryl A Scharkie, Susan M Perlen, Sharon R Goldfeld

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Criminal Legal System Experiences Among Families Receiving Home Visiting Services: A Scoping Review of the Literature.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Lynn KempSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Western Sydney University, Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Liverpool, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0348-1837
Tracey BruceSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Western Sydney University, Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Liverpool, New South Wales, Australia.
Emma L ElcombeSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Western Sydney University, Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Liverpool, New South Wales, Australia.
Fiona ByrneSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Western Sydney University, Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Liverpool, New South Wales, Australia.
Sheryl A ScharkieSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Western Sydney University, Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Liverpool, New South Wales, Australia.
Susan M PerlenPopulation Health, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Sharon R GoldfeldPopulation Health, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6520-7094
Ingham Institute · AUMurdoch Children's Research Institute · AURoyal Children's Hospital · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLittle is known about the efficacy of pregnancy screening tools using non-sensitive sociodemographic questions to identify the possible presence of as yet undiagnosed disease in individuals and later adverse childhood events disclosure.

objectivesThe study aims were to: 1) record the prevalence of risk disclosed by families during receipt of a sustained nurse home visiting program; and 2) explore patterns of relationships between the disclosed risks for their child having adverse experiences and the antenatal screening tool, which used non-sensitive demographic questions.

designRetrospective, observational study. PARTICIPANTS AND

methodsData about the participants in the intervention arm of the Australian right@home trial, which is scaffolded on the Maternal Early Childhood Sustained Home-visiting model, collected between 2013 and 2017 were used. Screening data from the 10-item antenatal survey of non-sensitive demographic risk factors and disclosed risks recorded by the nurse in audited case files during the subsequent 2 year intervention were examined (n = 348). Prevalence of disclosed risks for their child having adverse experiences were analysed in 2019 using multiple response frequencies. Phi correlations were conducted to test associations between screening factors and disclosed risks.

resultsAmong the 348 intervention participants whose files were audited, 300 were noted by nurses to have disclosed risks during the intervention, with an average of four disclosures. The most prevalent maternal disclosures were depression or anxiety (57.8%). Mental health issues were the most prevalent partner and family disclosures. Screening tool questions on maternal smoking in pregnancy, not living with another adult, poverty and self-reporting anxious mood were significantly associated with a number of disclosed risks for their child having adverse experiences.

conclusionsThese findings suggest that a non-sensitive sociodemographic screening tool may help to identify families at higher risk for adverse childhood experiences for whom support from a sustained nurse home visiting program may be beneficial.

Indexed as

Adverse Childhood ExperiencesAdultAustraliaChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHouse CallsHumansPostnatal CarePregnancyRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID36190969
PMCPMC9529103
OpenAlexW4300690459

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.