SynthesisPloS one2022
A systematic review of resilient performance in defence and security settings.
Synthesis in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- The first shot counts the most: Tactical breathing as an intervention to increase marksmanship accuracy in student officers.Military psychology : the official journal of the Division of Military Psychology, American Psychological Association · 2024Trial
- Advancing resilience science through cross-domain integration: Proceedings of an NIH workshop.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2026Review
- Relationship between salivary neuropeptide Y and performance under stress: a study on police firearms officers.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2026Article
- Does Vagal Nerve Activity Predict Performance in a Naval Commando Selection Test?Applied psychophysiology and biofeedback · 2025Review
- Development of the ARENA training programme for resilient performance in defense and security settings.Military psychology : the official journal of the Division of Military Psychology, American Psychological Association · 2025Article
- State and trait predictors of cognitive responses to acute stress and uncertainty.Military psychology : the official journal of the Division of Military Psychology, American Psychological Association · 2025Article
- The effect of cadet resilience on self-efficacy and professional achievement: verification of the moderated mediating effect of vocational calling.Frontiers in psychology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A narrative systematic literature review was conducted to explore resilient performance in defence and security settings. A search strategy was employed across a total of five databases, searching published articles from 2001 onwards that assessed performance and optimal function in relation to resilience, in defence and security personnel. Following narrative synthesis, studies were assessed for quality. Thirty-two articles met inclusion criteria across a range of performance domains, including, but not limited to, course selection, marksmanship, land navigation, and simulated captivity. Some of the key findings included measures of mental toughness, confidence, and a stress-is-enhancing mindset being positively associated with performance outcomes. There was mixed evidence for the predictive value of biomarkers, although there was some support for cortisol, dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate (DHEA-S) and neuropeptide-y (NPY), and vagal reactivity. Interventions to improve resilient performance were focused on mindfulness or general psychological skills, with effects generally clearer on cognitive tasks rather than direct performance outcomes in the field. In sum, no single measure, nor intervention was consistently associated with performance over a range of domains. To inform future work, findings from the present review have been used to develop a framework of resilient performance, with the aim to promote theoretically informed work.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.