ArticlePloS one2022
Preoperative prediction by artificial intelligence for mastoid extension in pars flaccida cholesteatoma using temporal bone high-resolution computed tomography: A retrospective study.
Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- [Staging of middle ear cholesteatoma surgery and its value for clinical decision-making].Lin chuang er bi yan hou tou jing wai ke za zhi = Journal of clinical otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery · 2026Review
- Hearing health professionals' attitudes and perceived skills toward artificial intelligence.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Image-based deep learning in otology: a state-of-the-art review.Frontiers in neurology · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence in the Diagnosis of Cholesteatoma: A Systematic Review of Current Evidence.Cureus · 2025Review
- Predicting Mastoid Extension and Complications such as Labyrinthine Fistula and Dural Exposure in Middle Ear Cholesteatoma Using Lesion Size and Detectability on Non-echo-planar Diffusion-weighted MR Imaging.Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · 2025Article
- Article
- Application of Artificial Intelligence in Otology: Past, Present, and Future.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Artificial Intelligence for Otosclerosis Detection: A Pilot Study.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2024Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Surgery: A Systematic Review of Use and Validation.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Augmented Reality-Assisted Transcanal Endoscopic Ear Surgery for Middle Ear Cholesteatoma.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Utility of deep learning for the diagnosis of cochlear malformation on temporal bone CT.Japanese journal of radiology · 2024Article
- Deep Learning Techniques and Imaging in Otorhinolaryngology-A State-of-the-Art Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Temporal Bone Imaging: Advances and Future Challenges.Cureus · 2023Review
- Preoperative prediction of sinonasal papilloma by artificial intelligence using nasal video endoscopy: a retrospective study.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Diagnosis, Treatment, and Management of Otitis Media with Artificial Intelligence.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Deep learning for discriminating cochlear malformations on temporal bone CT.Brazilian journal of otorhinolaryngologyArticle
- Combining Gabor-local and contextual-global deep features for cholesteatoma classification.Science progressArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cholesteatoma is a progressive middle ear disease that can only be treated surgically but with a high recurrence rate. Depending on the extent of the disease, a surgical approach, such as microsurgery with a retroarticular incision or transcanal endoscopic surgery, is performed. However, the current examination cannot sufficiently predict the progression before surgery, and changes in approach may be made during the surgery. Large amounts of data are typically required to train deep neural network models; however, the prevalence of cholesteatomas is low (1-in-25, 000). Developing analysis methods that improve the accuracy with such a small number of samples is an important issue for medical artificial intelligence (AI) research. This paper presents an AI-based system to automatically detect mastoid extensions using CT. This retrospective study included 164 patients (80 with mastoid extension and 84 without mastoid extension) who underwent surgery. This study adopted a relatively lightweight neural network model called MobileNetV2 to learn and predict the CT images of 164 patients. The training was performed with eight divided groups for cross-validation and was performed 24 times with each of the eight groups to verify accuracy fluctuations caused by randomly augmented learning. An evaluation was performed by each of the 24 single-trained models, and 24 sets of ensemble predictions with 23 models for 100% original size images and 400% zoomed images. Fifteen otolaryngologists diagnosed the images and compared the results. The average accuracy of predicting 400% zoomed images using ensemble prediction model was 81.14% (sensitivity = 84.95%, specificity = 77.33%). The average accuracy of the otolaryngologists was 73.41% (sensitivity, 83.17%; specificity, 64.13%), which was not affected by their clinical experiences. Noteworthily, despite the small number of cases, we were able to create a highly accurate AI. These findings represent an important first step in the automatic diagnosis of the cholesteatoma extension.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.