Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36190818›Full record

ArticleThe Gerontologist2023

Shared Care Networks Assisting Older Adults: New Insights From the National Health and Aging Trends Study.

Mengyao Hu, Vicki A Freedman, Sarah E Patterson, Nora Lewis

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Gerontologist, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
9.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Caregivers serving as confidants: relationship correlates and well-being by care-recipients' dementia status.The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Evolution of shared care networks by race and ethnicity: findings from the National Health and Aging Trends Study.The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Racial-Ethnic Differences in Care Networks of Older Adults: Empirical Exploration of Possible Explanations.The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. A look at caregivers for community-living persons with dementia: Implications for the GUIDE model.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Sharing in Caring: Family Caregiving Task-Sharing Patterns for Older Adults in Singapore.The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences · 2024
    Article
  17. Confidants and Caregivers: Network Multiplexity and Subjective Well-Being of Older Adults.The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mengyao HuInstitute for Social Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9044-9009
Vicki A FreedmanInstitute for Social Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4604-4207
Sarah E PattersonInstitute for Social Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5040-7576
Nora LewisInstitute for Social Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
University of Michigan · US

Funding

The National Health and Trends StudyU01AG032947 · NIA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI VICKI A. FREEDMAN, JENNIFER ANN SCHRACK · 2008 to 2026
$169.4M
Statistical Data EnclaveP30AG012846 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI VICKI A. FREEDMAN · 1999 to 2026
$23.2M
TRAINING IN THE DEMOGRAPHY OF AGINGT32AG000221 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Sarah A. Burgard · 1992 to 2026
$15.3M
Trends and Dynamics in Caregiving for Alzheimer’s Disease and Related Dementias: Extending the National Study of CaregivingR01AG062477 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI FREEDMAN, VICKI A., WOLFF, JENNIFER L. · 2019 to 2023
$10.0M
Caregiving for Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias: Enhancing the National Study of Caregiving (NSOC)R01AG054004 · NIA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI FREEDMAN, VICKI A., WOLFF, JENNIFER L. · 2016 to 2020
$4.5M
NIA NIH HHS P30 AG012846NIA NIH HHS R01 AG054004NIA NIH HHS R01 AG062477NIA NIH HHS T32 AG000221NIA NIH HHS U01 AG032947NIH HHS R01AG054004
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesCaregiving research often assumes older adults receiving care have a primary caregiver who provides the bulk of care. Consequently, little is known about the extent to which care responsibilities are shared more evenly within a care network, the characteristics associated with sharing, or the consequences for meeting older adults' care needs. RESEARCH DESIGN AND

methodsWe analyze a sample of U.S. older adults receiving care from the 2011 National Health and Aging Trends Study (n = 2,398). Based on variables reflecting differences in care hours, activities, and care provided by the whole network, we create network typologies for those with two or more caregivers (n = 1,309) using K-means cluster analysis. We estimate multinomial and logistic regression models to identify factors associated with network type and the association between type and unmet needs. We conduct analyses overall and for older adults living with and without dementia.

resultsAnalyses reveal four network types: Small, low-intensity shared care network (SCN); large, moderate-intensity SCN; small, low-intensity primary caregiver network (PCN); and moderate-sized, high-intensity PCN. Among all older adults receiving care, 51% have a sole caregiver, 20% have an SCN with no primary caregiver, and 29% have a PCN. Among older adults with dementia receiving intense care, unmet needs are lower among those with an SCN (vs. PCN). DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS: Findings underscore that the primary caregiver construct, although common, does not apply to a substantial share of care networks. Moreover, having an SCN when needs are high may be beneficial to meeting older adult's needs.

Indexed as

Activities of Daily LivingDementiaAgedAgingCaregiversHumansLogistic ModelsCaregiver networksDementiaUnmet need

Identifiers

PMID36190818
PMCPMC10268586
OpenAlexW4300687908

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.