Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36190658›Full record

ArticleMemory & cognition2023

Irrelevant speech impairs serial recall of verbal but not spatial items in children and adults.

Larissa Leist, Thomas Lachmann, Sabine J Schlittmeier, Markus Georgi, Maria Klatte

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Memory & cognition, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Larissa LeistCognitive and Developmental Psychology, University of Kaiserslautern, Erwin-Schrödinger-Str. 57, 67663, Kaiserslautern, Germany. lleist@rhrk.uni-kl.de.
Thomas LachmannCognitive and Developmental Psychology, University of Kaiserslautern, Erwin-Schrödinger-Str. 57, 67663, Kaiserslautern, Germany.
Sabine J SchlittmeierTeaching and Research Area of Work and Engineering Psychology, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.
Markus GeorgiTeaching and Research Area of Work and Engineering Psychology, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.
Maria KlatteCognitive and Developmental Psychology, University of Kaiserslautern, Erwin-Schrödinger-Str. 57, 67663, Kaiserslautern, Germany.
University of Kaiserslautern · DERWTH Aachen University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Immediate serial recall of visually presented items is reliably impaired by task-irrelevant speech that the participants are instructed to ignore ("irrelevant speech effect," ISE). The ISE is stronger with changing speech tokens (words or syllables) when compared to repetitions of single tokens ("changing-state effect," CSE). These phenomena have been attributed to sound-induced diversions of attention away from the focal task (attention capture account), or to specific interference of obligatory, involuntary sound processing with either the integrity of phonological traces in a phonological short-term store (phonological loop account), or the efficiency of a domain-general rehearsal process employed for serial order retention (changing-state account). Aiming to further explore the role of attention, phonological coding, and serial order retention in the ISE, we analyzed the effects of steady-state and changing-state speech on serial order reconstruction of visually presented verbal and spatial items in children (n = 81) and adults (n = 80). In the verbal task, both age groups performed worse with changing-state speech (sequences of different syllables) when compared with steady-state speech (one syllable repeated) and silence. Children were more impaired than adults by both speech sounds. In the spatial task, no disruptive effect of irrelevant speech was found in either group. These results indicate that irrelevant speech evokes similarity-based interference, and thus pose difficulties for the attention-capture and the changing-state account of the ISE.

Indexed as

SpeechSpeech PerceptionAdultAuditory PerceptionChildHumansMemory, Short-TermMental RecallPhoneticsSerial LearningAttentionAuditory distractionChanging-state effectChildrenIrrelevant sound effectSerial recallVerbal short-term memoryVisuo-spatial short-term memory

Identifiers

PMID36190658
PMCPMC9950248
OpenAlexW4300688164

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.