ReviewHeart failure reviews2023
Sex differences and related estrogenic effects in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.
Review in Heart failure reviews, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Sex differences in cardiovascular‑kidney‑metabolic syndrome: From pathogenesis to treatment response (Review).International journal of molecular medicine · 2026Review
- Predicting short-term composite outcome risk in heart failure patients using a machine learning model incorporating UHR: a retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
- Systemic Interactions in HFpEF: A Multiorgan Perspective on Pathways and Therapeutic Targets.Journal of cardiovascular translational research · 2025Review
- S-nitrosylation of cardiac myocyte proteins may underlie sex differences in cardiac disease.Frontiers in physiology · 2025Review
- Targeting estrogen receptor signaling for treating heart failure.Heart failure reviews · 2024Review
- Sex Differences in Repolarization Markers: Telemonitoring for Chronic Heart Failure Patients.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Chronic Heart Failure Management: Monitoring Patients and Intercepting Exacerbations.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is an essential subtype of heart failure accounting for 40% of the total. However, the related pathological mechanism and drug therapy research have been stagnant for a long time. The direct cause of this dilemma is the heterogeneity of HFpEF. And some researchers believe that there is no common pathway to reach the origin of HFpEF; others argue that there is an unidentified unified pathophysiological process hidden beneath the ice surface. Aside from the debate, a series of clinical studies have shown that hypertension and obesity play a fundamental role in the pathogenesis of HFpEF. These results imply that there may be two parallel pathological processes interweaved in one disease, manifested as multiple coexistent pathological phenomena, like a shadow. Meanwhile, the prevalence of HFpEF in women is higher than in men in any given age group, especially prominent in elderly patients. These pathological processes and epidemiological data reflect gender differences, reminding us to shift our attention to estrogen. This article will review the parallel pathogenesis of HFpEF, and also introduce sex differences and the potential effect of estrogen in this condition below.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.