Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36190555›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2022

Robot-assisted vs laparoscopic lateral transabdominal adrenalectomy: a propensity score matching analysis.

Carmela De Crea, Francesco Pennestrì, Nikolaos Voloudakis, Luca Sessa, Priscilla Francesca Procopio, Pierpaolo Gallucci, Rocco Bellantone, Marco Raffaelli

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. [Robotic adrenalectomy-current evidence].Chirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2024
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Carmela De CreaU.O.C. Chirurgia Endocrina e Metabolica, Centro Dipartimentale di Chirurgia Endocrina e dell'Obesità, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7303-9657
Francesco PennestrìU.O.C. Chirurgia Endocrina e Metabolica, Centro Dipartimentale di Chirurgia Endocrina e dell'Obesità, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy. francesco.pennestri@policlinicogemelli.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0865-700X
Nikolaos VoloudakisU.O.C. Chirurgia Endocrina e Metabolica, Centro Dipartimentale di Chirurgia Endocrina e dell'Obesità, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8316-4726
Luca SessaCentro di Ricerca in Chirurgia Endocrina e dell'Obesità, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, L.go A. Gemelli 8, 00168, Rome, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9894-4792
Priscilla Francesca ProcopioU.O.C. Chirurgia Endocrina e Metabolica, Centro Dipartimentale di Chirurgia Endocrina e dell'Obesità, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Pierpaolo GallucciU.O.C. Chirurgia Endocrina e Metabolica, Centro Dipartimentale di Chirurgia Endocrina e dell'Obesità, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7000-538X
Rocco BellantoneU.O.C. Chirurgia Endocrina e Metabolica, Centro Dipartimentale di Chirurgia Endocrina e dell'Obesità, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0844-3469
Marco RaffaelliU.O.C. Chirurgia Endocrina e Metabolica, Centro Dipartimentale di Chirurgia Endocrina e dell'Obesità, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1259-2491
Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore · ITAgostino Gemelli University Polyclinic · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLaparoscopic adrenalectomy (LA) is the gold standard treatment for adrenal lesions. Robot-assisted adrenalectomy (RAA) is a safe approach, associated with higher costs in absence of clear-cut benefits. Several series reported some advantages of RAA over LA in challenging cases, but definitive conclusions are lacking. We evaluated the cost effectiveness and outcomes of robotic (R-LTA) and laparoscopic (L-LTA) approach for lateral transabdominal adrenalectomy in a high-volume center.

methodsAmong 356 minimally invasive adrenalectomies (January 2012-August 2021), 286 were performed with a lateral transabdominal approach: 191 L-LTA and 95 R-LTA. The R-LTA and L-LTA patients were matched for lesion side and size, hormone secretion, and BMI with propensity score matching (PSM) analysis. Postoperative complications, operative time (OT), postoperative stay (POS), and costs were compared.

resultsPSM analysis identified 184 patients, 92 in R-LTA and 92 in L-LTA group. The two groups were well matched. The median lesion size was 4 cm in both groups (p = 0.533). Hormonal hypersecretion was detected in 55 and 54 patients of R-LTA and L-LTA group, respectively (p = 1). Median OT was significantly longer in R-LTA group (90.0 vs 65.0 min) (p < 0.001). No conversion was registered. Median POS was similar (4.0 vs 3.0 days in the R-LTA and L-LTA) (p = 0.467). No difference in postoperative complications was found (p = 1). The cost margin analysis showed a positive income for both procedures (3137 vs 3968 € for R-LTA and L-LTA). In the multiple logistic regression analysis, independent risk factors for postoperative complications were hypercortisolism (OR = 3.926, p = 0.049) and OT > 75 min (OR = 8.177, p = 0.048).

conclusionsThe postoperative outcomes of R-LTA and L-TLA were similar in our experience. Despite the higher cost, RAA appears to be cost effective and economically sustainable in a high-volume center (60 adrenalectomies/year), especially if performed in challenging cases, including patients with large (> 6 cm) and/or functioning tumors.

Indexed as

Adrenal Gland NeoplasmsLaparoscopyRoboticsAdrenalectomyHumansPostoperative ComplicationsPropensity ScoreRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeLaparoscopic adrenalectomyLateral transabdominal adrenalectomyOutcomesPostoperative complicationsRobot-assisted adrenalectomy

Identifiers

PMID36190555
PMCPMC9613740
OpenAlexW4300690892

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.