Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36190525›Full record

Trial reportClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research2022

A Phase I/II Trial of Nivolumab plus Ipilimumab in Children and Young Adults with Relapsed/Refractory Solid Tumors: A Children's Oncology Group Study ADVL1412.

Kara L Davis, Elizabeth Fox, Emasenyie Isikwei, Joel M Reid, Xiaowei Liu, Charles G Minard, Stephan Voss, Stacey L Berg, Brenda J Weigel, Crystal L Mackall

Open access · greenAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIClinical Trial, Phase I
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Trial
  4. Open-Label, Multicenter, Phase I/II, First-in-Human Trial of TK216: A First-Generation EWS::FLI1 Fusion Protein Antagonist in Ewing Sarcoma.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2024
    Trial
  5. Review
  6. The Next Frontier in Quantitative Co-Clinical Imaging to Advance Functional Precision Oncology.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2026
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Retinoblastoma and Its Tumor Microenvironment.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2026
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. CAR-T cell immunotherapy in rhabdomyosarcoma.Journal of translational medicine · 2026
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Kara L DavisDivision of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology/Stem Cell Transplantation, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University, Stanford, California.ORCID 0000-0002-7182-2592
Elizabeth FoxSt Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee.ORCID 0000-0002-9998-5326
Emasenyie IsikweiMayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.ORCID 0000-0003-1069-6147
Joel M ReidMayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.ORCID 0000-0003-2872-3123
Xiaowei LiuChildren's Oncology Group, Monrovia, California.ORCID 0000-0003-1365-5201
Charles G MinardBaylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.ORCID 0000-0003-4631-6943
Stephan VossDana Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.ORCID 0000-0002-2092-2219
Stacey L BergBaylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.ORCID 0000-0003-2832-9994
Brenda J WeigelUniversity of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.ORCID 0000-0003-1080-1402
Crystal L MackallDivision of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology/Stem Cell Transplantation, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University, Stanford, California.ORCID 0000-0003-0359-9023
Baylor College of Medicine · USCancer Prevention Institute of California · USMayo Clinic · USChildren's Oncology Group · CHDana-Farber Cancer Institute · USSt. Jude Children's Research Hospital · USUniversity of Minnesota · US

Funding

Women's Cancer ProgramP30CA015083 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI AKHILESH PANDEY · 1985 to 2026
$151.3M
Translational Oncology Research Program (Project-005)P30CA124435 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Vittorio Sebastiano · 2007 to 2026
$71.4M
PEP-CTN EHR to RAVE supplementUM1CA228823 · NCI · PUBLIC HEALTH INSTITUTE · PI Elizabeth Fox · 2018 to 2026
$39.6M
TRAINING GRANT IN CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGYT32GM008685 · NIGMS · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI Liewei Wang · 1998 to 2026
$8.2M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA015083NCI NIH HHS P30 CA124435NCI NIH HHS UM1 CA228823NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM008685
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIn many cancers, nivolumab in combination with ipilimumab improves response rates compared with either agent alone, but the combination has not been evaluated in childhood cancer. We conducted a phase I/II trial of nivolumab plus ipilimumab in children and young adults with recurrent/refractory solid tumors. PATIENTS AND

methodsADVL1412, Part C assessed safety of nivolumab plus ipilimumab at two dose levels (DL): DL1 1 mg/kg of each drug and DL2 3 mg/kg nivolumab plus 1 mg/kg ipilimumab. Part D evaluated response at the recommended phase II dose (RP2D) in Ewing sarcoma, rhabdomyosarcoma, and osteosarcoma. Part E tested DL3 (1 mg/kg nivolumab plus 3 mg/kg ipilimumab) in Ewing sarcoma and rhabdomyosarcoma. Tumor response was measured using RECIST v1.1. Pharmacokinetics and PD-L1 expression on archival tissues were assessed.

resultsFifty-five eligible patients enrolled. Based on safety, tolerability, and similar drug exposure to the same doses administered in adults, DL2 was defined as the pediatric RP2D. Among 41 patients treated at the RP2D, 2 patients experienced dose-limiting toxicities during cycle 1, and 4 patients experienced toxicities beyond that period. Two patients had clinically significant sustained partial responses (1 rhabdomyosarcoma, 1 Ewing sarcoma) and 4 had stable disease. Among 8 patients treated at DL3, 3 dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) occurred, all immune-related adverse events; no objective responses were observed.

conclusionsThe RP2D of nivolumab (3 mg/kg) plus ipilimumab (1 mg/kg) is well tolerated in children and young adults with solid tumors and shows some clinical activity. Increased dose of ipilimumab (3 mg/kg) plus nivolumab (1 mg/kg) was associated with increased toxicity without clinical benefit.

Indexed as

RhabdomyosarcomaSarcoma, EwingAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsChildHumansIpilimumabNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNivolumabYoung AdultIpilimumabNivolumab

Identifiers

PMID36190525
PMCPMC10597535
OpenAlexW4300688643

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.