Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36190262›Full record

ReviewThe journal of physical chemistry. A2022

Graph-Driven Reaction Discovery: Progress, Challenges, and Future Opportunities.

Idil Ismail, Raphael Chantreau Majerus, Scott Habershon

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The journal of physical chemistry. A, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Graph-Based Generation and Reduction of Complex Chemical Reaction Networks.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. How Does Adenine Form from Hydrogen Cyanide?Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2026
    Article
  4. The seeds of the future are in the present: A blind exploration of metastable states.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Automated Microsolvation for Minimum Energy Path Construction in Solution.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Reactant Discovery with anACS earth & space chemistry · 2024
    Article
  11. Contact-Map-Driven Exploration of Heterogeneous Protein-Folding Paths.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Exploring Chemical Space UsingACS central science · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. ΔChemical science · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Idil IsmailDepartment of Chemistry, University of Warwick, CoventryCV4 7AL, United Kingdom.
Raphael Chantreau MajerusDepartment of Chemistry, University of Warwick, CoventryCV4 7AL, United Kingdom.
Scott HabershonDepartment of Chemistry, University of Warwick, CoventryCV4 7AL, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-5932-6011

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Graph-based descriptors, such as bond-order matrices and adjacency matrices, offer a simple and compact way of categorizing molecular structures; furthermore, such descriptors can be readily used to catalog chemical reactions (i.e., bond-making and -breaking). As such, a number of graph-based methodologies have been developed with the goal of automating the process of generating chemical reaction network models describing the possible mechanistic chemistry in a given set of reactant species. Here, we outline the evolution of these graph-based reaction discovery schemes, with particular emphasis on more recent methods incorporating graph-based methods with semiempirical and

Identifiers

PMID36190262
PMCPMC9574932

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.