Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36190064›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of ophthalmology2022

An insight into the altered ophthalmic dynamics during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Jaya Kaushik, Eram Riyaz, Y V K Chaitanya, Renu Nair, Ashok Kumar, Ankita Singh, J K S Parihar, S Srikant, Rakesh Shetty

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of ophthalmology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jaya KaushikDepartment of Ophthalmology, Golden Jublee Block, Armed Forces Medical College, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
Eram RiyazDepartment of Ophthalmology, Golden Jublee Block, Armed Forces Medical College, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
Y V K ChaitanyaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Golden Jublee Block, Armed Forces Medical College, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
Renu NairDepartment of Ophthalmology, Golden Jublee Block, Armed Forces Medical College, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
Ashok KumarDepartment of Ophthalmology, Golden Jublee Block, Armed Forces Medical College, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
Ankita SinghDepartment of Ophthalmology, Golden Jublee Block, Armed Forces Medical College, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
J K S PariharDepartment of Ophthalmology and Post Graduate Training and Education, Centre for Sight, New Delhi, India.
S SrikantDepartment of Ophthalmology, Golden Jublee Block, Armed Forces Medical College, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
Rakesh ShettyDepartment of Ophthalmology, Golden Jublee Block, Armed Forces Medical College, Pune, Maharashtra, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: The objective of this survey-based study was to examine the effects of personal protective measures taken at the level of instrument and surgeon during the pandemic on the optics in ophthalmology. Methods: The study involved an online questionnaire of 24 questions which was distributed to ophthalmologists practicing in several hospitals, including residents and fellows undergoing training in ophthalmology in India. The responses were collected through an online data collection tool (Google forms). The participants could choose from multiple options provided to them in each question. Results: A total of 285 participants out of 296 had used modified methods for examining and performing surgical procedures during the pandemic, while 78.7% (265) of the participants acknowledged having encountered difficulty in interpreting the ocular findings of patients while examining in personal protective equipment. Moreover, 58.7% (198) of our study respondents also reported that there was significant worsening of the quality of ophthalmological examination with pandemic-appropriate measures and 84.8% (286) of our study participants also felt that these measures have significantly added to the time of examination, hence increasing the risk of exposure to both patient and doctor. Conclusion: The workplace study has highlighted the crucial aspects of optics in ophthalmology during the pandemic. The protective measures taken during the pandemic have significantly worsened the quality of ophthalmological examination and increased the time taken to perform outpatient department-based and surgical procedures in ophthalmology.

Indexed as

COVID-19OphthalmologistsOphthalmologyHumansPandemicsPersonal Protective EquipmentSARS-CoV-2Surveys and QuestionnairesCOVID-19ophthalmologyopticspandemic

Identifiers

PMID36190064
PMCPMC9789823

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.