Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36190056›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of ophthalmology2022

Comparison of three techniques of harvesting full-thickness retinal tissue for large or persistent macular holes.

Abhinav Dhami, Rupak Kanti Biswas, Mohit Dogra, Ramandeep Singh, Sangeet Mittal, Dhanashree Ratra

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of ophthalmology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Optimal approaches for managing recurrent macular holes: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Abhinav DhamiDhami Eye Care Hospital, Ludhiana, Punjab, India.
Rupak Kanti BiswasNetralayam- The Superspeciality Eye Care Centre, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.
Mohit DograDepartment of Vitreoretinal Diseases, Advanced Eye Centre, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Ramandeep SinghDepartment of Vitreoretinal Diseases, Advanced Eye Centre, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Sangeet MittalDepartment of Vitreoretinal Diseases, Thind Eye Hospital, Jalandhar, Punjab, India.
Dhanashree RatraDepartment of Vitreoretinal Diseases, Sankara Nethralaya, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Sankara Nethralaya · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the success rate of autologous retinal graft (ARG) for the closure of full-thickness macular holes (MHs) and compare the outcomes of three different techniques of harvesting the graft. Methods: Clinic files of all patients who had undergone ARG for MH using intraocular scissors, membrane loop, or retinal punch to harvest retinal tissue were retrospectively reviewed. All patients were evaluated for MH closure, retinal reattachment, and visual improvement. Results: Twenty-two eyes of 22 patients were included. ARG was done for 16 eyes (72.7%) with failed, large persistent MH, and six eyes (27.3%) also underwent simultaneous repair of retinal detachment. The basal diameter of MH was 1103.67 ± 310.09 (range 650-1529) μm. Intraocular scissors were used in 10 eyes (45.5%), a membrane loop in five eyes (22.7%), and a retinal punch in seven eyes (31.8%). Silicone oil tamponade was used in seven (31.8%) eyes and gas in 15 (68.1%) eyes. The follow-up ranged from 6 to 18 months. The hole closure rate was 72.7% (16/22). Visual improvement was noted in 18 eyes (81.8%). Retinal reattachment was seen in all eyes. Good graft integration with the surrounding area was seen in 17 eyes (77.3%). Graft retraction was seen in four eyes (18.18%) and graft loss in one eye (4.55%). No significant differences were noted among the three groups. Conclusion: ARG is successful in closing large, failed MH with and without retinal detachment. A membrane loop and retinal punch are equally useful in harvesting the graft, but scissors are preferable in case the retina is detached. With all three techniques, integration of the graft with the surrounding tissue can be achieved.

Indexed as

Myopia, DegenerativeRetinal DetachmentRetinal PerforationsHumansRetinaRetrospective StudiesSilicone OilsTomography, Optical CoherenceVisual AcuityVitrectomySilicone OilsAutologous Retinal Graftmacular holeretinal detachmentretinal punchvitrectomy

Identifiers

PMID36190056
PMCPMC9789844
OpenAlexW4300689531

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.